when I get into that domain, as a young innocent engineer, in love with science, having misssed an internship in DESY synchrotron, to develop telex-over-VHV-power-line (yest I know look a pity)... I got so innocent that: - I did not understand that physicist may say it was impossible, since it was happening in lattice and strange thinga happen very different from free space.. but I imagined thay had ruled out collective effects, resonance, with some math I could not undesrtand(I was young, and unexperienced with group corporate stupidity)... - i did not understand why they were denying reality of experiments, without evidences (even in 1993 there was evidence letting clear DOUBT it MAY be real n- even for me). - Being conservative i was surprised scientist did not jump on that anomaly, on the probable artifacts, just to discover a NEW THING that may be useful (as an engineeer I know any stupid phenomenon may be useful one day - and engineeer can even find the problem that can be solved by a phenomenon, if no problem exist solved by the phenomenon - we are kiddish)
4there is 3 crimes agains science that I've thus observed: 1- making a strawman theory to rule out possibility, instead of admitting ignorance 2- rejecting evidences because of a theoretical impossibility 3- not trying to understand the artifact they were denouncing 4- not trying to make an application of the artifact 2014/1/8 Terry Blanton <[email protected]> > Sounds like something Eugene Mallove might have said. > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well said… >> >> >> >> *From:* James Bowery >> >> >> >> The only crime against science worse than arguing against experimental >> results with theory is falsification of experimental results. That's why >> these "scientists" use their chain of "logic" to arrive at "fraud". >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
