One manifestation of the LENR reaction that your theoretical thinking has been very weak on is the explanation of the Rossi reactor meltdown when high temperature material can melt at temperatures in excess of 2000C.
Will you now attempt to explain how this high heat event can occur, and explain the details of how this particular reaction can happen? I believe that the extremes of a reaction can reveal the detailed essence of the reaction. I also wonder if you will cover Ken Shoulders discovery of transmutation in spark production as well as transmutation produced in the proton 21 experiment? On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]>wrote: > Axil, this insight will be provided in a book that will take my first > book, written in 2007, to the present and show how the observations have > been explained and how they can be better explained without conflict with > what is known. Unfortunately, so many different opinions exists in the > field, no one would believe what I propose without the complete evidence > only a book can provide. > > Too many attempts at creating a theory are based on pure imagination > without any relationship to reality or to what is actually observed. People > simply do not read the literature. This is understandable because about > 2000 papers must be found and read, which is a full time job. Enough > information is now available to make rejection of most theories possible > and to identify where the unique mechanism functions in the process. > Nothing about the process conflicts with what is known. The unique > mechanism is new and I predict the full understanding will warrant a Nobel > prize by someone in the distant future. The best analogy to past > discoveries would be the realization by Pauli that a neutrino-like particle > existed based on how the energy of beta decay was found to be less than the > required mass-energy change. Until then, people had no clue such a particle > was possible. In the case of LENR, a new force is revealed that is hidden > in plain sight in exactly the same way. A person only needs to know where > to look. > > My book will describe my path to a solution. Of course, this will open the > door to another rejection event by all the theoreticians and everyone who > thinks they know how the effect works. But, then the book will speak for > itself without my having to waste time in endless debate. > > Ed Storms > > > > On Jan 12, 2014, at 2:58 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > > >> >> >> >> I'm in the process of studying all the explanations and comparing them to >> what is known in LENR and in general science. The failure to make progress >> in explaining LENR is easy to see and a clear path to the correct >> explanation is becoming obvious, at least to me. The problem has a >> solution if you know where to look. >> >> >> I am sure that all here want to get a preview of this emerging solution. >> Is it possible to reveal to us a preview? >> > >
