First of all, Axil, we do not know which part of e-Cat melted or the
melting point of this material. Without this knowledge, speculation is
pointless. We know only that the temperature reached the melting point
of some material in the reactor. The NAE could not have melted
because otherwise energy production would stop before the energy
required to form a liquid could be produced.
Many odd phenomenon have been revealed, not all of them are related to
LENR. The Shoulders EV is created only by spark discharge and the
proton-21 effect requires intense electron bombardment. Both produce
conditions well outside of what exists during LENR. Nevertheless,
clearly several unexpected conditions can cause nuclear reactions.
Their relationship will be better understood once LENR is understood.
To do other wise would be like trying to understand how fire works by
studying the sun. We need to stay in the parameter space known to
apply, at least initially.
Ed Storms
On Jan 12, 2014, at 4:49 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
One manifestation of the LENR reaction that your theoretical
thinking has been very weak on is the explanation of the Rossi
reactor meltdown when high temperature material can melt at
temperatures in excess of 2000C.
Will you now attempt to explain how this high heat event can occur,
and explain the details of how this particular reaction can happen?
I believe that the extremes of a reaction can reveal the detailed
essence of the reaction.
I also wonder if you will cover Ken Shoulders discovery of
transmutation in spark production as well as transmutation produced
in the proton 21 experiment?
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Edmund Storms
<[email protected]> wrote:
Axil, this insight will be provided in a book that will take my
first book, written in 2007, to the present and show how the
observations have been explained and how they can be better
explained without conflict with what is known. Unfortunately, so
many different opinions exists in the field, no one would believe
what I propose without the complete evidence only a book can provide.
Too many attempts at creating a theory are based on pure imagination
without any relationship to reality or to what is actually observed.
People simply do not read the literature. This is understandable
because about 2000 papers must be found and read, which is a full
time job. Enough information is now available to make rejection of
most theories possible and to identify where the unique mechanism
functions in the process. Nothing about the process conflicts with
what is known. The unique mechanism is new and I predict the full
understanding will warrant a Nobel prize by someone in the distant
future. The best analogy to past discoveries would be the
realization by Pauli that a neutrino-like particle existed based on
how the energy of beta decay was found to be less than the required
mass-energy change. Until then, people had no clue such a particle
was possible. In the case of LENR, a new force is revealed that is
hidden in plain sight in exactly the same way. A person only needs
to know where to look.
My book will describe my path to a solution. Of course, this will
open the door to another rejection event by all the theoreticians
and everyone who thinks they know how the effect works. But, then
the book will speak for itself without my having to waste time in
endless debate.
Ed Storms
On Jan 12, 2014, at 2:58 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
I'm in the process of studying all the explanations and comparing
them to what is known in LENR and in general science. The failure to
make progress in explaining LENR is easy to see and a clear path to
the correct explanation is becoming obvious, at least to me. The
problem has a solution if you know where to look.
I am sure that all here want to get a preview of this emerging
solution. Is it possible to reveal to us a preview?
