I mentioned the energy lost to the catalyst when I actually meant to include all of the various sinks. The main point I was intending to make is that energy and thus the mass associated with that energy exits the hydrino. I have one idea as to how that loss of mass may be distributed among the electron and proton. If the volume taken up by the electric fields is reduced by the closer orbital of the electron, then I would tend to think of it as being extracted from the field pattern. That would appear to include both components. This is speculation on my part.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: mixent <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, Jan 16, 2014 8:15 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Observation on a BLP (patent?) document In reply to David Roberson's message of Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:38:01 -0500 (EST): Hi, [snip] >Actually, the mass of the hydrino should be reduced since it has less energy than zero level hydrogen. That energy and hence mass has been lost to the catalyst. Not all the energy is lost to the catalyst. The rest appears as either UV or kinetic energy. According to my model mass is lost by both electron and proton. > >Dave > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Terry Blanton <[email protected]> >To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >Sent: Thu, Jan 16, 2014 12:06 pm >Subject: Re: [Vo]:Observation on a BLP (patent?) document > > > > > > > Does the relative mass of a hydrino increase with each reduced orbital radius due to the increase angular momentum of the orbiting electron? Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
