In the Papp engine, that one of the mysteries of that process is that it
produces little heat. The energy density in the Mills cell indicates the
production of little heat. I think this lack of heat condition is all
connected under the nano-particle causation principle.


On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:16 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Axil, I realize that there may be some interesting behavior associated
> with this material.  The exact mechanism responsible for the generation of
> water vapor may be difficult to discern.
>
> When ice sublimes, or water evaporates, a similar process may be taking
> place.  Heat is extracted from the water remaining during vaporization so
> that a net cooling of the remaining water takes place.  If I recall, wind
> blowing over a wet leaky bag is used for cooling in some locals.  Vapor
> sprays can be used in a similar fashion.
>
> The real question is how does the boiled water generated within the nano
> particles make its way to the surface of the container without heating much
> of the surrounding water.  If we find that the distance traveled is tiny,
> then there is no big mystery here.  On the other hand, if the vapor travels
> a significant distance through cool water without depositing heat in that
> water, then that should get our attention.
>
> Dave
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: Axil Axil <[email protected]>
> To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wed, Jan 22, 2014 4:00 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nanoparticles make steam without bring water to a boil.
>
>  One characterization of the process that you have not considered is
> localization. The water boils around the nanoparticle but the average
> temperature of the waterdoes not rise.
>
>  Another enhancement of the effect is the development of Bose-Einstein
> condensation. When all the localize nanoparticle hot spots are connected
> superfulidically and share the incoming energy, enhance energy
> concentration might result.
>
>  Using water as the reaction substrate precludes the development of BEC
> formation due to its cooling effect. Using hydrogen does not stop BEC
> formation.
>
>
>  On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:44 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Normally, I assume that all of the incoming energy, in this case light
>> photons, that is not reflected away ends up heating the water.  Anything
>> that concentrates the energy into a small region, such as appears to be
>> happening with this device, will boil a tiny quantity of water.  This is
>> not unusual except that the nano particles appear to be able to do a fine
>> job of concentrating the energy; better than most techniques.  And, some of
>> the local energy used to boil the water might be extracted from the
>> remaining water resulting in its cooling.  Add everything up and you likely
>> have no above unity gain.
>>
>> There is no indication of LENR activity that I am aware of.  Perhaps Axil
>> has seen some reference to this effect to discuss.  At any rate, the total
>> energy contained in the boiled water system can not be greater than the
>> input energy from the light source unless some mysterious means is present.
>>
>> I do not see any need to assume LENR is omnipresent in every experiment.
>> Some results are simple physics and the one being discussed here most
>> likely is just that.  Where does anyone suggest that excess heat is being
>> generated by this process?  You can observe sublimation just by looking at
>> the ice being converted directly into vapor.  How is that much different?
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>> From: Axil Axil <[email protected]>
>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
>>   Sent: Wed, Jan 22, 2014 2:25 pm
>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nanoparticles make steam without bring water to a boil.
>>
>>  In order to understand if over unity power production is occurring, the
>> energy content of the incoming solar photons shall be determined and
>> compared to the output energy content of the steam produced.
>>
>>  Experimenters must use this procedure or its like to determine the COP
>> of solar cells.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:09 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> The total energy contained by the steam must be no greater than the
>>> input light energy.  This is not magic, just a way to concentrate the
>>> incoming light.  I am assuming that LENR of some sort is not contributing.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Axil Axil <[email protected]>
>>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Wed, Jan 22, 2014 1:33 pm
>>> Subject: [Vo]:Nanoparticles make steam without bring water to a boil.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.technologyreview.com/news/507821/nanoparticles-make-steam-without-bringing-water-to-a-boil/
>>> Nanoparticles can concentrate the energy of photons on a localized
>>> nanometric scale. Here is a application of this ability.
>>> Steam is a key ingredient in a wide range of industrial and commercial
>>> processes—including electricity generation, water purification, alcohol
>>> distillation, and medical equipment sterilization.
>>> Generating that steam, however, typically requires vast amounts of
>>> energy to heat and eventually boil water or another fluid. Now researchers
>>> at Rice University have found a shortcut. Using light-absorbing
>>> nanoparticles suspended in water, the group was able to turn the water
>>> molecules surrounding the nanoparticles into steam while scarcely raising
>>> the temperature of the remaining water. The trick could dramatically reduce
>>> the cost of many steam-reliant processes.
>>>
>>> The Rice team used a Fresnel lens to focus sunlight on a small tube of
>>> water containing high concentrations of nanoparticles suspended in the
>>> fluid. The water, which had been cooled to near freezing, began generating
>>> steam within five to 20 seconds, depending on the type of nanoparticles
>>> used. Changes in temperature, pressure, and mass revealed that 82 percent
>>> of the sunlight absorbed by the nanoparticles went directly to generating
>>> steam while only 18 percent went to heating water.
>>> “It’s a new way to make steam without boiling water,” says Naomi Halas,
>>> director of the Laboratory for Nanophotonics at Rice University. Halas says
>>> that the work “opens up a lot of interesting doors in terms of what you can
>>> use steam for.”
>>> The new technique could, for instance, lead to inexpensive
>>> steam-generation devices for small-scale water purification, sterilization
>>> of medical instruments, and sewage treatment in developing countries with
>>> limited resources and infrastructure.
>>> The use of nanoparticles to increase heat transfer in water and other
>>> fluids has been well studied, but few researchers have looked at using the
>>> particles to absorb light and generate steam.
>>> In the current study, Halas and colleagues used nanoparticles optimized
>>> to absorb the widest possible spectrum of sunlight. When light hits the
>>> particles, their temperature quickly rises to well above 100 °C, the
>>> boiling point of water, causing surrounding water molecules to vaporize.
>>> Precisely how the particles and water molecules interact remains
>>> somewhat of a mystery. Conventional heat-transfer models suggest that the
>>> absorbed sunlight should dissipate into the surrounding fluid before
>>> causing any water to boil. “There seems to be some nanoscale thermal
>>> barrier, because it’s clearly making steam like crazy,” Halas says.
>>> The system devised by Halas and colleagues exhibited an efficiency of 24
>>> percent in converting sunlight to steam.
>>> Todd Otanicar, a mechanical engineer at the University of Tulsa who was
>>> not involved in the current study, says the findings could have significant
>>> implications for large-scale solar thermal energy generation. Solar thermal
>>> power stations typically use concentrated sunlight to heat a fluid such as
>>> oil, which is then used to heat water to generate steam. Otanicar estimates
>>> that by generating steam directly with nanoparticles in water, such a
>>> system could see an increased efficiency of 3 to 5 percent and a cost
>>> savings of 10 percent because a less complex design could be used.
>>> Otanicar cautions that durability—the ability of nanoparticles to
>>> repeatedly absorb sunlight and generate steam—still has to be proved, but
>>> adds that the 24 percent efficiency achieved in the current study is
>>> encouraging. “It’s just the beginning for optimizing this approach,” he
>>> says.
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to