You are using EUV production as proof for the existence of hydrinos, but another source of this radiation exists in the environment that hydrinos are purported to exist.
This fact invalidates this proof unless Mills proves that the EUV is coming from the hydrino and only the hydrino and not nanoparticles. On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Mike Carrell <[email protected]> wrote: > Framk, the hydrino transition radiation is in the low nanometer range, to > which everything is opaque and be seen only with vacuum ultraviolet > spectroscopy. That region is also called ‘soft X-rays’. That fact causes > difficulty in extracting the energy; you can just let the reactor get hot – > but that is inefficient. The elegance of CIHT technology is charge > separation, so the device looks to the outside world like a battery. The > efficiency of MHD conversion is theoretically very high. > > > > Pay careful attention to Mills’ language. The **peak** power output of > the SF-CIHT reaction is very, very high. The proposed device fires pulses > at high speed, but the average power output will depend on design factors. > > > > Mike Carrell >
