LENR is 2D because of the very high frequency of dipole vibration, Being a 2D superconductor, there may be zero loss around the edge of the EMF vortex flow. Any dark mode EMF accumulation must be superconducting where no power is lost to the far field.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]>wrote: > Note that superconductors are only zero resistance for DC. As the > frequency goes up, there is a finite resistance that increases with > frequency. At 1 GHz RF, the superconductor still has some advantage over > copper at the same frequency. As you start going beyond 10 GHz > superconductors become less useful and at some frequency, there is a > cross-over and copper is better. For the upper microwave bands, resonators > with highest Q are pure dielectric devices with no conductor at all. > > So using a "superconductor" for THz or optical resonators is not > practical. HTC superconductors are worse than type 1 superconductors in > this respect. Otherwise superconductors would always look white (or mirror > if polished) if they were zero resistance at optical frequencies because > they would have perfect reflectance. HTC superconductors are black. > > 1D systems will behave differently, and there may be some opportunity > there. I don't believe SPPs are 1D. > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 7:26 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> The superconducting regions might be detectable by the way they interact >> with electromagnetic waves. There is discussion about trapped photons from >> time to time and that might be due to the zero loss walls of a >> superconducting cavity. I can't think of a better method of trapping >> energy for a significant amount of time. This process may appear somewhat >> like what happens when a photon impacts an atom and its energy is stored >> within. The superconducting cavity could behave like a much larger version >> that can trap many photons at the same time. >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Mon, Jan 27, 2014 1:55 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:"energy driven superconductivity" and IR coherence for >> LENR >> >> Edmund Storms <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> The claims are based on assumptions, not on direct measurements normally >>> used to identify a superconductor. >>> >> >> Yes, the claims are speculation. It would be impossible to make direct >> measurements across microscopic domains. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
