Jones Beene
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=from:%22Jones+Beene%22>
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:17:06 -0800
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=date:20140128>
/Any News you get will only happen through BLP itself or by way of a preapproved
journalist who got the News direct from BLP and had the story cleared./
/All attendees were required to sign an NDA in which they agreed not to mention
anything whatsoever about the proceedings to others, nor even to admit that
they attended. It is almost Nazi-esque.
Mills will make a video and a News Release to suggest that the demo was a
glowing success - when in fact it could have been closer to a joke, in terms of
real science and accurate results. Dissent will not be permitted.
That last comment is of course an opinion, but at least there is no way than
anyone knowledgeable can argue with it - or otherwise they will have violated
the NDA :)
/It looks like you were wrong. Here is a report from an attendee./
/
"...So, about the demo. There were about 65 to 70 people present. There
was no opportunity for a meet and greet. I did not know most of the
attendees, but there were representatives from chemical and engineering
firms present as well as OEMs and major investment banks. I am not sure
of the extent of media present. There were no TV cameras, but there was
a video being taken. Many people were taking notes, but I don't think
there was a lot of mainstream media there. I think the presentation was
geared more towards developing interest among potential licensees and
partners rather than media. Media will come in time.
Randy stated that the SF-CIHT results have been validated by four
outside groups, but only one spoke at the meeting. That validator was
from Rowan University so I am sure that many of the critics will dismiss
his comments out of hand. Whatever. I tend to believe people who
actually view the experiments and study the results rather than simply
post negative comments on the Internet. The validator unequivocally
confirmed the reported results from the newly developed SF-CIHT cell and
stated it was a "game changer". I thought one interesting moment was
when the validator was asked whether he believed in hydrinos. His answer
was something to the effect that this wasn't a matter of belief, but
about experimental results and that he was confident in the results.
The demonstrations were instantaneous bursts with input and output
measured by established commercial devices including waterbath
calorimetry. Continuous operation was not demonstrated so skeptics will
likely be dismissive of the results. Randy spent some time explaining
plans for achieving continuous operation. While there are some
engineering issues ahead, the energy outputs are so astounding that
there should be multiple ways to make useful devices.
While I have seen some comments that BLP rushed this demo because of
recent developments relating to Rossi, such commenters obviously don't
know Randy. Randy is going to do things on his time and nobody else's.
He is not concerned with Rossi and, from second hand reports I have
heard, BLP does not view Rossi as competition because they do not think
his experiments are professionally done and do not believe that he is
accurately measuring energy input and output.
My overall impression is that this demo was put together because, after
many years of slow but steady progress, Blacklight has made recent,
dramatic improvements in the energy densities. I think Randy believes
the results are unassailable and irrefutable. My sense is that yesterday
was the first step in what will be an evolving, more visible presence
for Blacklight as they continue to advance the technology."
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/01/report-from-the-blacklight-power-demonstration/
