From: a.ashfield
It looks like you were wrong. Here is a report from an
attendee.
I may be wrong, but the evidence for that is not apparent yet.
[snip] That validator was from Rowan University so I am sure
that many of the critics will dismiss his comments out of hand.
Could that be because Mills has funded Rowan to the tune of several hundred
thousand dollars over the years, to perform this work - and it turns out
that Janssen is Mills' personal friend ?
Since when are funded validations considered independent?
Whatever. I tend to believe people who actually view the
experiments and study the results rather than simply post negative comments
on the Internet.... The demonstrations were instantaneous bursts with input
and output measured by established commercial devices including waterbath
calorimetry. Continuous operation was not demonstrated so skeptics will
likely be dismissive of the results.
Ya' think ? Well they should dismiss this kind of meaningless result. It's
very easy to mislead without continuous operation. Mills is at least two
years behind Rossi who has shown tens of kW of continuous operation last
year.
Randy spent some time explaining plans for achieving
continuous operation.
And who can believe that explanation, given the track record? Did he explain
how well those five Utility companies in New Mexico are doing with their
fabulous "solid fuel reactors" which they licensed several years back and
which is no longer being mentioned? Same kind of hoopla back then.
While there are some engineering issues ahead, the energy
outputs are so astounding that there should be multiple ways to make useful
devices.
Like the Papp "popper". Yawn. How much has really changed with Mills since
he failed to deliver on the Capstone Turbine? Not much.
This still looks like a demo set-up purely to milk more funding out of
investors - in response to the reports of Rossi's coup. Those investors in
BLP should be tiring of this kind of staged dog-and-pony show, after all the
years of one disappointment after another.
Sorry, nothing new here.
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
