The full text of the waiver has been released as per your and Lynn Kurtz's challenge.
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/conversations/messages/1729 Basically, limits BLP liability and disallows personal recording (photography, audio, and video.) Participants were otherwise unrestricted. - Brad On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Apparently on the E-Cat site, which I tried to sign up for but was > unsuccessful, someone posted this: > Randell Mills responded to Jones Beene. > # Reading on some other sites I read that all the attendees at today's > demonstration > # at BLP were required to sign non-disclosure agreements. Even including > # not disclosing that they attended in the first place. Is that true? > Randell Mills: No that is a lie. We were absolutely open with unrestricted > full > disclosure of all materials and methods using commercial instrumentation. > In fact, we intend to make the entire videotaped demonstration open to the > public." END of E-Cat posting. > So there you have it, vorticians - apparently from Mills himself. > However, I'm not convinced that this post came from Randell Mills. There are > a number of shills for Mills roaming the various News groups, including > Vortex. Anyone can sign up on these forums, using almost any name. If this > posting did come from Mills, and he wishes to publicly call me a liar - then > I challenge him to post the full text of the NDA which was required. Then I > will apologize. But the chances of Mills posting this are slim to none. > The proof is in the pudding folks. There were 35 attendees and not a single > one has posted a single detail publicly. That sounds a lot like full control > over the demonstration - via a legal document. Is Mills trying to sneak out > the back door by calling the document something besides and NDA? > The truth will out you Randy, so come clean - before your are embarrassed > even more than you have been already. >
