Jones Beene
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=from:%22Jones+Beene%22>
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:17:44 -0800
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=date:20140129>
"That is a waiver, OK - but was it the only document required?
Coming back to Earth - it is not out of the question that all of this
obsessive talk about the reality of an NDA, or a waiver, or both... which -
let's face it - is a triviality in the big picture, amounts to an impromptu
diversion, perhaps to cover up the fact that the actual demo was a bust."
What has BLP done to stir you up like this? You have no more proof that
the demo was a bust than you had for your claim for a NDA, where it
looks like you were wrong. The only news we have had so far, the
attendee didn't see anything amiss. That he could write anything rather
proves the point.
