To me the most interesting part was the q+a toward the end. From about
1:53:00 to 2:05:00 he finally cuts loose from the script and makes a
strong case for the quality and significance of his research. It left me
with a somewhat improved impression of BLP's prospects. The engineering
challenge is bigger than he lets on but still within reach given deep
enough pockets and careful design.
On 2/3/2014 5:16 PM, James Bowery wrote:
Measurements of the energy output and spectral evidence for the
hydrino theory start at 1:16:25
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net
<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>> wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Craig
He says he's ready to license the technology, and that there are
companies he's going to meet which may do that. He thinks that a
prototype could be built in a 'lightning fast' period of time, maybe a
couple of months.
Well this is déjà vu all over again, isn't it?
Flashback 6 years to 2008. Almost the same Press Release.
Different process,
different players, same old shtick.
"BlackLight Power, Inc. is the inventor of a new primary energy
source with
applications to Heating, Central Power, Motive Power, and
Micro-Distributed
power generation. This relies on a new chemical process of
releasing the
latent energy of the hydrogen atom... This new process generates
electricity
for as cheap as 1 cent/kW-hour - two to four times cheaper than
any other
contemporary power sources. The company has licensed to seven
utilities
8,250 megawatts of clean, safe hydrino generation fueled by water --
eliminating $2 billion/year in fuel costs."
Flash forward 6 years. How much of that 8,250 megawatts of clean, safe
hydrino power generation have those 8 Utility companies who
licensed the BLP
process in 2008, actually produced in the intervening years?
Answer: zero.
Why? Who knows? I guess this is another one of those inconvenient
truths.
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
George
Santayana
