a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> Let it run for a long time on a glass table." > > There is always some claim. It has a battery hidden in it etc. It is easy to eliminate that objection. Weigh the entire device and compute how much energy it could hold if the entire device is a battery. I am not sympathetic to inventors who will not make such an obvious demonstration and evaluation because they say there will be "objections" like this. It is easy to overrule such objections. > If some recognized university would run a test they might be believed, > but it is beneath their dignity or they don't want to be seen considering > something contrary to mainstream theories. LENR is a good example. > It is not a good example because many recognized universities did test LENR, and they did confirm it and publish confirmations. That has not happened with a single magnetic motor. If one of them is real, I am confident the inventor could convince people such as me, and I -- in turn -- could probably convince others to look at it. I could probably get it funded. That is more important than convincing university professors. Actually, the person you want to convince is Terry Blanton. He is our resident expert in magnetic motors. He says he looked at some of them closely and found they did not work. I doubt they work. They violate the conservation of energy, unlike LENR. All the above also applies to gravity driven motors. - Jed
