Oh, now I get the point. You can't build a mechanism which extracts more energy from the rotation of the earth then you put into the mechanism.
On the other hand, if the goal is to lengthen the day rather than generate useful energy, then such a mechanism would be considered useful. :- / harry On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 3:09 PM, H Veeder <[email protected]> wrote: > ...and the rotational speed of the earth will descrease as a consequence. > > harry > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 3:06 PM, H Veeder <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Focault's pendulum could be used to extract energy from the rotation of >> the earth. >> >> harry >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> You're undoubtedly right. It makes me wonder if these simple newtonian >>> problems from dynamics 101 can be so >>> >>> mind blowing, what's the chances of analyzing these bizarre non-linear >>> maxwellian/relativistic/quantum mechanical kinds >>> >>> of problems. >>> >>> >>> >>> Hoyt >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Nigel Dyer [mailto:[email protected]] >>> *Sent:* Sunday, February 9, 2014 10:34 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:: RAR gravity engine >>> >>> >>> >>> As I found out some years ago when I spent a couple of months on this, >>> whatever system you come up with, when you actually go through the maths it >>> comes up with the same answer, and that is that you cannot extract energy >>> from the rotation of the earth without reference to some external body. >>> You can come up with complicated systems that makes the maths more >>> difficult (our gyroscopes on railway tracks travelling between the pole and >>> the equator was particularly 'interesting' to analyse. I'm not sure that >>> 15 years later my brain is still up to it, that why I get my son to do it), >>> and that is what may have happened with the RAR machine. Its complexity >>> hides a mistake in the analysis of the forces and moments which made it >>> appear that it was possible to extract energy from the earths magnetic >>> field. >>> >>> Nigel >>> >>> <http://www.avast.com/> >>> >> >
