Eric,  I agree with you that special relativity is going to be a hard one to 
bring down.  I have tried plenty of times to no avail.

An ether does not appear to be required for the transmission of electromagnetic 
waves.  My first encounter with that issue came up in fields classes when my 
professors derived the speed of travel for an electromagnetic disturbance by 
using factors that are measured at steady state conditions.  It seemed 
remarkable that the electric fields for static charges and magnetic fields 
measured for steady currents could enter into a differential equation that 
predicted the velocity of light.

Combine the static measurement support and the brilliant insight of Einstein 
and his special relativity theory and everything falls into place.

Dave

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Walker <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, Feb 18, 2014 11:25 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Time Dilation impossibility



On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 6:39 PM, John Berry <[email protected]> wrote:




Also, I would genuinely like to know if anyone disagrees with my arguments, or 
fails to understand them.



I had a hard time following your examples and counterexamples, but I suspect 
that relativity will not be so easy to pull apart.  There's probably a 
misunderstanding about one or more of the claims it's making.  I get the 
impression that relativity fits the known facts to within a very small error, 
and that any thought experiments concerning corner cases that are far removed 
from everyday experience nonetheless remain internally consistent.  It will 
probably require more than a simple thought experiment to call it into doubt.



And if you do agree, would you conclude that an aether of some type is 
logically required?




I do not imagine an ether is required as a result of a failure of relativity 
due to internal inconsistencies.  I think it just makes conceptual sense for a 
wave (e.g., electromagnetic wave) to be a wave traveling in some medium.  What 
is that medium?  Perhaps something like an ether.  An ether that meets this 
simple requirement, however, is not necessarily something that one would be 
able to detect.


Eric




Reply via email to