In reply to Mike Carrell's message of Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:13:56 -0500: Hi Mike, [snip]
"Nascent H2O" is nothing more than single molecule water (i.e. no Hydrogen bonds). When Brown's gas is burnt, chemical chain reactions occur, some of which involve the creation of Hydrogen and Oxygen radicals. e.g. H2 + O => H + OH H + O2 => O + OH H + OH => H2O OH + H2 => H2O + H (?) OH + OH => H2O + O (?) A neutral Hydrogen radical is nothing more than a Hydrogen atom. IOW the combustion of Brown's gas will produce at least some Hydrogen atoms. It will also produce individual water molecules, IOW nascent water molecules, which can (according to Mills) catalyze the shrinkage of some of the H atoms. IOW some Hydrino production is to be expected when Brown's gas is burnt. How much is however a much more difficult question to answer. >Lack of actual study of Mills' postings as led some to assume that the CIHT >process is somehow a variation of the claims made for Brown's Gas. >Essentialy, it is claimed that the gases from water electrolysis, when >burnt, yield more energy than H2 and O2 produced separately. In the past, I >have witnessed fund-raising demonstrations purporting to show this effect, >but without use of calorimetric methods. > > > >Actual reading of the documents available on the BLP website will show that >'electrolysis ' is not involved in the production of the *nasent*H2O >catakyst, which can be written HOH to indicate that it is not common H2O, >which has a lower potential energy and is not a BLP catalyst. The >description of the creation of *nascent*H2O is descrbed in a paper on the >website. What was demonstrated in the video was the activation of a pellet >of solid fuel heated by a strong pulse of electricity. The Technical >Presentation on the website shows details of an apparatus for producing and >activating fuel pellets a rapid rate, with only consumible being ordinary >water. > > > >Mike Carrell Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
