What about different dielectric values different for the plastic? (or more in-depth analysis dielectric hysteresis)
Maybe different electro-positivety/negativity? Sounds like a long shot in a practical sense. Could the spectra that gets through show a different pattern? What about a UV fluorescence? What about thermal insulative properties, if some change faster after a temperature drop an IR camera will pick it yp. John On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes I think Peter said something about the first week in February > > Bob > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Monday, March 03, 2014 2:13 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Plastic detector find > > Yes, I thought of Jones as well grounded and has a very good understanding > of the potential quantum theory behind the animal, keeps Axil grounded and > knows most of the history. Axil adds some contemporary flare and pinache > and flips through cutting edge research papers like hotcakes. > > I am trying to connect the quantum dots with the astrophysical dudes to > see if our flintsones model of the universe is dead & I think it is just > about there. > > Has anybody heard from Peter? he is awfully quiet... > > Stewart > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Stewart-- >> >> I think Jones has that first slot already taken. (:>) >> >> >> Bob >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Sent:* Monday, March 03, 2014 10:47 AM >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Plastic detector find >> >> I'm not sure if I want to write a million books or sell a million >> books... Anyway I am having fun piecing all the parts together, right or >> wrong and scaling it up to "cosmic scales" and developing/refining a >> theory. Sort of a bottom up approach. I find that posting a short one or >> two page post to a blog every couple of days is much easier than thinking >> about writing a formal book. I have a young editor following behind me and >> assembling the research/postings into a few annotated books. >> >> I think you could be the next "Tom Clancy" of cold fusion...you have a >> great skill of piecing together research papers, forming a theory and >> throwing in a little mystery and government intrigue. >> >> All good stuff. >> >> Stewart >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Maybe you can become the new Isaac Asimov, He was a chemist who wrote a >>> million books about everything with lots of references. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:07 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> I grabbed an illustration off the Chandra telescope site. >>>> >>>> http://chandra.harvard.edu/ >>>> >>>> I figured my tax dollars helped pay for it. Amazon makes you use the >>>> words "annotated" or "illustrated" in your book name if you are using >>>> information within the public domain. I have lots of snippets, links and >>>> references. It is sort of a cobbled together "theory of everything" from >>>> an engineer with ADD. >>>> >>>> I am putting a book out this week on Doppler Radars and their negative >>>> effect on biology based upon my research, but I can't decide between >>>> Dopplerpocalypse, DopplerGeddon, Dopplerganger or Dopzilla. What do you >>>> think? >>>> >>>> Stewart >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Saturday, March 1, 2014, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> That's a nice cover. How did you make it? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Frank >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> >>>>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >>>>> Sent: Fri, Feb 28, 2014 9:13 pm >>>>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Plastic detector find >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.amazon.com/Dark-Matters-Lot-Annotated-Experiment-ebook/dp/B00HZ05VIE/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1390339797&sr=1-1 >>>>> >>>>> It is basically the first 6 months of my blog (darkmattersalot.com) >>>>> adapted to an Ebook. It is a chemical engineer's hunt for dark/vacuum >>>>> energy in our atmosphere using basic thermodynamics, string/M theory and >>>>> the National Weather Service... I am modeling the Sun and Earth as two >>>>> "branes" of vacuum(6-D torroids) with strings and particles of vacuum >>>>> stringing and streaming between them in the solar wind I started tracking >>>>> low pressure systems off the equatorial jet and polar jets in 2012 and >>>>> modeling them as if they were strings of vacuum, triggering >>>>> hurricanes(entangled strings), waterspouts, >>>>> sinkholes/seismic(ionizing/decay where strings are entering the Earth) and >>>>> ionizing our atmosphere as they decay in our jet streams triggering >>>>> electromagnetic effects. These mesovortexes and supercells that break off >>>>> the jet streams are basically "topological defects" of the "cosmic" >>>>> strings >>>>> of vacuum that break off and decay and trigger our storms, which is really >>>>> the inflation phase of our quantum gravity field from the solar wind. >>>>> >>>>> I have two more books coming out, one will be the next 6 months of the >>>>> blog. The other book is focused on Doppler Microwave radars, which I >>>>> think, >>>>> based upon 6 months of study, including statistics, are triggering an >>>>> increase in vacuum upsets around the radars, including an increase in >>>>> sinkholes, shallow seismic events, mesovortex events, hypoxia/algae blooms >>>>> in waters (through ionization and oxidation). >>>>> >>>>> If you take what Axil, Jones, Fran and others have been talking about >>>>> at the atomic level and scale the vacuum energy up to the "cosmic level", >>>>> it sort of follows along. I am working with two professional researchers >>>>> now and feeding them my data around the towers to see if they get the same >>>>> results with some other biological data. In 1956 Doppler radars were taken >>>>> from the military and used for weather forecasting. Although they do a >>>>> lot >>>>> of good, I think they are also damaging biology. >>>>> >>>>> I have had a lot of fun developing a theory and piecing it all >>>>> together in whatever direction it takes me. As I have looked closely at >>>>> doppler radars, I have been recently looking at all of the cruise ship >>>>> illnesses with norovirus. I am looking at those large cruise ships and >>>>> they have people partying on elevated decks directly beside and between >>>>> multiple 20,000-30,000 watt pulsed Doppler microwave radars inside the >>>>> large radomes. I think those radars may be triggering the illness >>>>> outbreaks. If you are going on a cruise, I would advise not hanging out >>>>> too close to them. My partner was a military pilot on an aircraft carrier >>>>> and they NEVER walked close to operating radars. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/02/26/does-this-seem-remotely-safe-to-anybody/ >>>>> >>>>> I have all sorts of scientific data I found from the 1990's on >>>>> concerns with Doppler radars causing cancer and related disease. >>>>> Norovirus >>>>> is basically strands of RNA, I think the microwave radars, along with the >>>>> increased vacuum, may be creating it FROM HUMANS. >>>>> >>>>> You and Terry are electrical engineers, do you guys think that is a >>>>> good idea to put your head beside a 30,000 watt pulsed microwave radar >>>>> while drinking a Pina Colada?? >>>>> >>>>> Stewart >>>>> darkmattersalot.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:08 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> What book did you write? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I sold 3 books in February, but I found out one sale was my wife, >>>>> does that count? >>>>> >>>>> I think more people are interested in watching Justin Beiber pee in a >>>>> trash can. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >
