On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
I wrote "p+Ni", but I meant "d+Ni".
>
> The d+Ni reaction would have to be the Oppenheimer-Phillips version, to be
> statistically relevant. Here is a blip on Passell’s O-P theroy. I have not
> found it as a separate file.
>
> http://coldfusionnow.org/iccf-18-day-5-presentations-and-awards/
Yes! Yesterday I borrowed (stole) the OP idea from you. (I didn't know
that I also borrowed it from Thomas Passel, although he seems to be looking
at palladium.)
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg92381.html
I just discovered that you wrote concerning the OP angle back in 2010 (and
Abd Lomax replied):
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
In answer to Abd Lomax's question about how to accelerate the deuteron, I'm
venturing that this would be done by way of an electric arc between two
insulated nickel grains. Although one expects a fast proton as a result, I
think we have to posit something that short-circuits the resulting kinetic
energy in order to avoid a situation where there is a Chernobyl's worth of
Bremsstrahlung coming out of the system.
Eric
