I wrote:

The claim I will egregiously ignore for the moment as either being artifact
> or something that is different from what we currently understand it to be
> is the idea that there were twice as many gas molecules after the
> experiment had run than at the time it had started.
>

I think I found a way out of this difficulty.  There might be a
straightforward way to explain the increase in the number of gas molecules
after the runs by Yoshida et al.  If we're seeing neutron capture after a
deuteron has been forced to approach a nickel lattice site, with a
corresponding expelling of a 5-7 MeV proton, we can expect there to be a
lot of spallation.  Here is an image of what I have in mind:

http://i.imgur.com/cATIdcT.png

The idea is that the current from an arc between two grains is causing
great downward pressure on deuteron ions, forcing them into a recess in one
of the grains.  (They're ionized because they're in the midst of an
electric arc.)  That pressure forces a deuteron at the bottom of the recess
to approach close to one of the lattice sites.  At some point the
Oppenheimer-Phillips process takes over and strips the neutron from the
deuteron, yielding a high-energy proton.  While the lattice site barely
moves, the proton flies with great force into the ions above it.  As
happens when a bullet is fired into water or sand, the momentum of the
proton is quickly dampened.  In the process you can expect a spallation, in
which some of the other deuterons are broken apart into protons and
neutrons.  The neutrons will have a half-life of 14 minutes and will decay
into protons.  Outside of the electric arc the protons will combine to form
some multiple of H2 molecules of the original number of D2/DH molecules
that were fed into the system.  Since the high-energy proton is colliding
primarily with other ionized protons and deuterons, I'm guessing there will
be little high-energy Bremsstrahlung from collisions with lattice site
electrons.

Presumably all of this happens before a dislocation occurs at the bottom of
the recess and relieves some of the pressure.

Eric

Reply via email to