I hope this is the 6 month test he promised, heh!
2014-04-09 12:16 GMT-03:00 Alan Fletcher <[email protected]>: > He's been dropping a lot of hints (qualified with could be > positive,negative..) > > Andrea Rossi > April 5th, 2014 at 7:55 > AM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=841&cpage=6#comment-937378> > > Marco Serra: > By my nature, I am an optimistic person. Should I not be, I wouldn't > dedicate my life to an enterpreneurial scientific task. Nevertheless, I > always said that this work is extremely risky, and that this enterprise is > a warship, not a cruiseship. The Third Indipendent Party Test in course is > a long run test, never made before from anybody. In this scientific > endeavour there is not a history to sustain you when you make something > new: every time you, so to speak, have to cut your way through the jungle > with machetes. It is always risky, and you always are, or HAVE TO BE, very > conservative: conservatively optimist. The test in course is very severe, > as no tests before have been and I cannot be sure that the calculations > that will be made upon the operation of the Hot Cat, second by second, will > be positive. The Professors are collecting millions of data, I do not know > the kind of complex calculations the Professors are doing and will do. They > have more science than I do and, beyond the hilarious comment of our friend > Orsobubu, which obviously made me smile, I am really afraid of the results. > After the Arxiv publication I said that a long test run had been scheduled > to better understand and this implies that the play was still open. As a > logic consequence of these considerations, if I today say that the results > can be positive, but also could be negative, I really mean it. > Thank you for your permanent attention, > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > > Andrea Rossi > April 5th, 2014 at 1:53 > PM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=841&cpage=6#comment-937506> > > Sam Wilson: > Thank you for your kind words. I am really worried. Anyway, the work goes > on. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > > Andrea Rossi > April 8th, 2014 at 9:02 > PM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=841&cpage=6#comment-939181> > > Frank Acland: > I do not know where the report will be published. I agree with you, > though. The report will be written by 7 Professors and Physicists of three > European Universities, who obviously review each other, and it will be > further reviewed by other 7 Professors and Physicists of 7 Universities and > Nuclear Physics Institutes of Europe, Asia, America before being proposed > for publication. The report will be based upon millions of data collected > by the measurement and registration instruments of the Professors and of > their Institutes. The whole funded by an European scientific Institute. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > [ Presumably the 3 Universities are Bologna and 2 Swiss as before ] > > (lenr.qumbu.com -- analyzing the Rossi/Focardi eCat -- and the > defkalion hyperion -- Hi, google!) > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
