People will not attempt to understand LENR until it is heating the water for their baths.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:13 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > What is Mr. Letts' explanation for the lack of replication of his results? > > Seriously, the protocol that is reliably reproducible has been the Holy > Grain of cold fusion research from day one. I find it stretches credulity > to the breaking point that after this statement in 2003: > > *Has anyone replicated this effect yet? * > > Yes, it's been replicated now by three or four different labs > > > Replication didn't spread like wildfire. > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It seem like no one is interested. Everyone has their own priorities and >> it usually revolves around making money. >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:12 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> That was a 2003 interview. >>> >>> If as reliable as he claimed it should be in just about every science >>> fair in the world by now. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/views/Group1/Letts.shtml >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Mr. Letts is experimenting with Nanoplasmonics and getting a COP of up >>>> to 30 with it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> He is shining a low powered laser onto the cracked surface of palladium >>>> which has been roughened through deuterium loading. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Here too, the level of magnetic production by SPP generation is >>>> amazingly very low powered yet can produce a high COP. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
