Fran-- "all the gas atoms in a local region are blissfully unaware of their
dilation relative to each other."
This sounds like the opposite of a quantum system--maybe an "anti quantum"
system.
I think that its more likely that the Dirac Sea includes more than just
positrons and electrons in a one dimensional array. Scalar fields are much
simpler than three dimensional one's. Furthermore, such a scalar may not be
really scalar at very small dimensions, for example between 10^-18 cm and
10^-35 cm. Of course below 10^-35 cm there is no concern. That's the nature
of the one dimensional field where all particles can blissfully ignore each
other from 0 to 10^-35 cm. We should call that scalar field, Plank's virtual
string field. Plank and Dirac, I guess, knew each other, kinda like you and
Jones do.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: Roarty, Francis X
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 12:14 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Lensing in spinplasmonics and SPP
Jones,
I like your 2nd verse [snip] Photons from 3-space could be lensed
into one dimension, where they are upshifted and reflected back into 3-space
with added energy - even when the Dirac sea itself is not disrupted. That would
be an alternative explanation for excess non-nuclear energy to appear in those
reactions where little gamma radiation is seen. [/snip] and agree with the
sentiment of the first [snip] The irony of that happenstance - for LENR is that
the near-field electrostatic repulsive forces between two DDL atoms could make
the possibility of nuclear fusion vastly less probable, while at the same time
acting as a ultra-strong magnifying lens for photons.[/snip] but not the method
suggested.. Would not Naudt's relativistic hydrogen provide the same? That is
the local atoms would be unaware of their transformation and their attraction
and or repulsion would be unchanged and based on only local differences in
velocity like 2 aircraft caught in the same wind pattern the relative velocity
to the stationary Ni would be changed to the point of dilation enabling the DDL
but since it is the space time that the gas atoms occupy which is being
modified by the Ni geometry all the gas atoms in a local region are blissfully
unaware of their dilation relative to each other.
Fran
_____________________________________________
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 12:21 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Lensing in spinplasmonics and SPP
Here is a current story on the magic of gravitational lensing.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-27118405
At the cosmological level - light is bent and amplified by gravity, appearing
far brighter than it is - due to a large galaxy being located directly in our
line of sight.
The analogy for spinplasmonics, and it is only an analogy - is that an
extremely large but localized magnetic field can act as a lens for IR photons.
When a monatomic atom of hydrogen becomes densified (via spinplasmonics) as a
DDL particle with the electron orbital at only a few Fermi in distance, can it
act as a lens for photons? If so, you heard it first on Vortex J
Here is the oft-cited paper on DDL with calculations.
http://www.fulviofrisone.com/attachments/article/359/Electron%20Transitions%20on%20Deep%20Dirac%20Levels%20II.pdf
With this kind of "shrinkage" (i.e. diminution in geometry) for the hydrogen
atom, the inverse square relationship makes both the magnetic and electric
fields of the DDL comparatively immense.
The irony of that happenstance - for LENR is that the near-field
electrostatic repulsive forces between two DDL atoms could make the possibility
of nuclear fusion vastly less probable, while at the same time acting as a
ultra-strong magnifying lens for photons.
Photons from 3-space could be lensed into one dimension, where they are
upshifted and reflected back into 3-space with added energy - even when the
Dirac sea itself is not disrupted. That would be an alternative explanation for
excess non-nuclear energy to appear in those reactions where little gamma
radiation is seen.
