Hi Bob, my point has always been that the Ni geometry is the quantum contribution not the DDL hydrogen - The Ni geometry suppresses virtual particles in a local region based on Casimir geometry independent of whether the gas atoms are present or not. The anomalous energy is actually the same zero point/HUP that keeps helium from freezing solid at 0 kelvin. The COE caveat that gas motion energy is unexploitable is based on the fact that these breaches in isotropy normally occur only below the Planck scale averaging out long before the scale of physical matter and it is my position that if the isotropy is really being broken by Casimir geometry as some papers have indicated then these regions are large enough to react with physical matter in a biased and exploitable manner. That said if you introduce gas atoms into these regions of broken isotropy they will experience different vacuum densities in local regions that vary in opposition to the normal square law of our macro isotropy and that this difference should be exploitable - cancelling the caveat of COE with respect to gas motion. This is really a poor mans time machine changing vacuum density without a deep gravity well or near C spatial displacement albeit only on a nano scale and suppressing the density instead of compressing it. Jan Naudts proposed the hydrino as relativistic hydrogen back in 2005 but comparison to the hydrogen escaping the suns corona was a red herring for many because near C hydrogen is a "Positive equivalent acceleration" [intersecting with more virtual particles and compressing], while suppressing virtual particles with geometry is "Negative equivalent acceleration " accelerating time from our perspective instead of the slowing we have come to accept for compression like the Twin Paradox. There are claims of radioactive decay anomalies that would fit this relativistic theory of casimir effect and it may even be the basis for catalytic action as mere geometry rips wandering gases around in opposition to the square law. Fran
From: Bob Cook [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 3:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Lensing in spinplasmonics and SPP Fran-- "all the gas atoms in a local region are blissfully unaware of their dilation relative to each other." This sounds like the opposite of a quantum system--maybe an "anti quantum" system. I think that its more likely that the Dirac Sea includes more than just positrons and electrons in a one dimensional array. Scalar fields are much simpler than three dimensional one's. Furthermore, such a scalar may not be really scalar at very small dimensions, for example between 10^-18 cm and 10^-35 cm. Of course below 10^-35 cm there is no concern. That's the nature of the one dimensional field where all particles can blissfully ignore each other from 0 to 10^-35 cm. We should call that scalar field, Plank's virtual string field. Plank and Dirac, I guess, knew each other, kinda like you and Jones do. Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: Roarty, Francis X<mailto:[email protected]> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 12:14 PM Subject: RE: [Vo]:Lensing in spinplasmonics and SPP Jones, I like your 2nd verse [snip] Photons from 3-space could be lensed into one dimension, where they are upshifted and reflected back into 3-space with added energy - even when the Dirac sea itself is not disrupted. That would be an alternative explanation for excess non-nuclear energy to appear in those reactions where little gamma radiation is seen. [/snip] and agree with the sentiment of the first [snip] The irony of that happenstance - for LENR is that the near-field electrostatic repulsive forces between two DDL atoms could make the possibility of nuclear fusion vastly less probable, while at the same time acting as a ultra-strong magnifying lens for photons.[/snip] but not the method suggested.. Would not Naudt's relativistic hydrogen provide the same? That is the local atoms would be unaware of their transformation and their attraction and or repulsion would be unchanged and based on only local differences in velocity like 2 aircraft caught in the same wind pattern the relative velocity to the stationary Ni would be changed to the point of dilation enabling the DDL but since it is the space time that the gas atoms occupy which is being modified by the Ni geometry all the gas atoms in a local region are blissfully unaware of their dilation relative to each other. Fran _____________________________________________ From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 12:21 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Lensing in spinplasmonics and SPP Here is a current story on the magic of gravitational lensing. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-27118405 At the cosmological level - light is bent and amplified by gravity, appearing far brighter than it is - due to a large galaxy being located directly in our line of sight. The analogy for spinplasmonics, and it is only an analogy - is that an extremely large but localized magnetic field can act as a lens for IR photons. When a monatomic atom of hydrogen becomes densified (via spinplasmonics) as a DDL particle with the electron orbital at only a few Fermi in distance, can it act as a lens for photons? If so, you heard it first on Vortex :) Here is the oft-cited paper on DDL with calculations. http://www.fulviofrisone.com/attachments/article/359/Electron%20Transitions%20on%20Deep%20Dirac%20Levels%20II.pdf With this kind of "shrinkage" (i.e. diminution in geometry) for the hydrogen atom, the inverse square relationship makes both the magnetic and electric fields of the DDL comparatively immense. The irony of that happenstance - for LENR is that the near-field electrostatic repulsive forces between two DDL atoms could make the possibility of nuclear fusion vastly less probable, while at the same time acting as a ultra-strong magnifying lens for photons. Photons from 3-space could be lensed into one dimension, where they are upshifted and reflected back into 3-space with added energy - even when the Dirac sea itself is not disrupted. That would be an alternative explanation for excess non-nuclear energy to appear in those reactions where little gamma radiation is seen.
