David, To say it in another way, you can average the power in Mike Tyson's punch over one minute and say that it is low average power when in fact it knocked you on your ass in a fraction of a second. That is the error in judgement I believe the radar physorcists have made and we are all paying dearly for. Think of mama and the baby on a hillside deck getting swept by those pulses 5 or 6 times a minute and you will understand what I mean. What if time did not exist like Einstein and others have claimed and you could not average that pulse over time??? What would you do then?
These are the NEXRAD WSR-88 "Standard" Doppler Weather Radar Specs (there are ~150 of these in service in the US). Due to the higher gain they have more power density @ 10 km than an ASR-9 radar. Radar/Call SignFFCModelWSR-88DMax Pulsed Power (Watts)1000000Gain (dBi)45.5Frequency (MHz)2,850.0RPM6.0Max Power Density (W/m2) @ 10 km112.9Pulse Duration(uSec) 1.6Pulse Repition Factor (Hz)800Range Est. (Miles)143Latitude33.36358856 Longitude-84.56607328FIPS13113CountyFayetteStateGAComments/SourceUpgraded to Dual Pol in 2010-2012 These are the Airport TDWR "Standard" Doppler Weather Radar Specs (There are ~ 50 of these in service) TDWR 5615 MHzModelTDWRMax Pulsed Power (Watts)250,000Gain (dBi)50Frequency (MHz)5,575RPM5Max Power Density (W/m2) @ 10 km79.58Pulse Duration(uSec)1.1Pulse Repition Factor (Hz)2000Range Est. (Miles)56Latitude33.64659872Longitude -84.26191362FIPS13151CountyHenryStateGA On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:01 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > The specifications for the radar system below are typical of a pulsed > radar system and not what I would expect from a standard Doppler radar. > The duty cycle appears to be .1% for the unit listed whereas a Doppler > radar is CW. The average power is 1300 watts of RF into the antenna, I > assume. The gain of the antenna may be 34 dB relative to an isotropic > radiator. > > Someone might be thinking of a pulsed Doppler radar which measures the > change in transmit frequency of the returning pulses to get target velocity > information. That type of radar is not a standard Doppler. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Walker <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Sun, May 11, 2014 9:18 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio > > Stewart, > > I have glanced at your web site. I have not taken a close look at your > research, but I would not be surprised if you ended up being onto something > about doppler radar being a source of hypoxia, oxygen free radicals and the > death of nearby animal and plant life. You also have a theory of dark > matter, and a hunch that dark matter is indirectly responsible for the > conclusions concerning doppler radar that you arrive at in your informal > research. > > On the connection to dark matter, I personally have no opinion. I am > skeptical, however, that your research is sufficient to establish any kind > of linkage between the effects of doppler radar and dark matter, however. > In light of this doubt, I think you might be able to get your > investigation into doppler radar out to a wider audience if you did not > combine it with the question of dark matter. Adding dark matter into the > mix asks too much of people in their suspension of disbelief for them to be > able to give much credibility to your doppler radar hunch, even if both > hunches ended up being true. > > Eric > > > > On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:55 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Radar/Call SignMHTModel ASR-9Max Pulsed Power (Watts)1,300,000Gain (dBi) >> 34Frequency (MHz)2,800RPM12.5Max Power Density (W/m2) @ 10 km 10.39Pulse >> Duration(uSec)1.00Pulse Repition Factor (Hz)1,000Range Est. (Miles)60 >> Latitude42.937248 Longitude-71.437286FIPS33011CountyHillsboroughStateNH >> > >
