Bob, agreed. I told the biologist that is running statistics that I think the microwave radars may be breaking RNA/DNA strands and triggering single stranded RNA viruses like norovirus outbreaks on cruise ships.
http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/04/27/were-cooked/ On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > wrote: > Dave-- > > One possible effect is the resonant absorbtion of radiation by > biologically active molecules, which cause ionization and destruction of > the molecules. This is particularly damaging when the molecule is a DNA or > RNA molecule. Weak H bonds occur in these molecules and such destruction > leads to modified DNA or RNA activity. The average heating idea also is > appropriate, however it is not as much as a problem as the destruction or > disabling of the large molecules that control the body's production of > other complex molecules. DNA in skin and eye cells would be more > susceptible than those more deeply situated in the body. Reproductive > organs near the surface of the body are more venerable to such radiation > and hence to genetic changes that are passed on to offspring. Such a > problem applies to humans as well a smaller animals and birds that have the > least amount of shielding of their gonads. > > The other issue associated with DNA destruction could be the stimulated > emission of tritium by the exposure to the intense radiation of the > radars. Tritium is a bad actor when it decays in a nucleus of a cell. The > beta from the tritium is about 18 Kev. This energy is deposited over a > path of about 6 microns. The average dimension of a cell nucleus is about > 6 to 10 microns. This means a large fraction of the beta from tritium > decay is deposited in the nucleus where it is bound to cause numerous > double breaks of DNA molecules and the genetic damage that goes along with > these breaks. Such mutagenic effects were observed in the vole population > around Chernobyl after the nuclear accident as a result of tritium > contamination in the drinking water consumed by the vole population. > > (Considering the damage to gene cells of the body, the EPA drinking water > standard for tritium, 20,000 pico curies per liter, is way to high (about > 100 times) to prevent unreasonable damage to gene cells. Small breeding > populations of animals, including some populations of humans, can be > unreasonably affected by such high bodily tritium concentrations as allowed > by the current standards. The justification by the EPA and the ICRP that > any defects in the genetics passed on to the society get greatly diluted to > reduce risk, does not apply to small breeding populations. And of course, > if you are one in a million of the people at risk that develop a health > problem that is non-mutagenic , it does not help you at all.) > > I am one to believe that there should be no risk to vertebrates, except > birds, existing around hazards that causes more than one health effect of > the population subjected to the hazard. Important insects such as bees > should be included in this no risk criteria. > > Bob > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* David Roberson<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > *To:* [email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > *Sent:* Monday, May 12, 2014 7:57 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio > > Radar systems detect the target based upon the average power incident > upon it. This is due to the continuous behavior of noise which tends to > mask the signal. Heating of the target becomes averaged out during the > complete period of the base pulse which in this case is about 1 milisecond. > > Of course, the reflected wave must be generated by instantaneous currents > on the target surface as you suggest. If the problem you are analyzing > occurs during the 1 microsecond time frame then it is quite possible for it > to be demonstrated. The skin effect also comes into consideration at the > high RF frequencies which tends to reduce penetration of the signal into > the target. Better conductivity of the material decreases the dept rapidly. > > A true Doppler radar would have the full heating effect due to the RF > maximum power level as long as the antenna pattern illuminates the target > you are considering. Also, the pulsed radar pattern of the radar mentioned > impacts upon your desired target for a small portion of the dish rotation > time. The average target heating must be adjusted accordingly. > > I do not understand the nature of the damage that you are considering with > your research. If it is associated with the average heating as with a > microwave oven then the pulse duty cycle, etc. needs to be integrated into > the equations. My comments earlier were directed toward clarifying the > difference between a true Doppler radar and a more of less standard pulsed > system. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ChemE Stewart > <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > > > To: vortex-l > <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > > > Sent: Mon, May 12, 2014 7:17 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio > > David, the ASR-9 is an airport survellience radar. That is correct about > the gain, weather/military doppler radar gains are 45-50 dbi, more focused > dishes. The instantaneous pulses are > 1,000,000 watts but they are only > on for 1/1000 of each second. Does nature average that high power pulse > over 1 second like you are doing? And if it does, how does nature do that? > Does it induce instantaneous electrical currents? Nature operates at the > speed of light, right? A lot goes on in nature in 1/1000 of a second that > we don't even see. > > > > On Sunday, May 11, 2014, David Roberson > <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> > wrote: > >> The specifications for the radar system below are typical of a pulsed >> radar system and not what I would expect from a standard Doppler radar. >> The duty cycle appears to be .1% for the unit listed whereas a Doppler >> radar is CW. The average power is 1300 watts of RF into the antenna, I >> assume. The gain of the antenna may be 34 dB relative to an isotropic >> radiator. >> >> Someone might be thinking of a pulsed Doppler radar which measures the >> change in transmit frequency of the returning pulses to get target velocity >> information. That type of radar is not a standard Doppler. >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eric Walker <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Sun, May 11, 2014 9:18 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio >> >> Stewart, >> >> I have glanced at your web site. I have not taken a close look at your >> research, but I would not be surprised if you ended up being onto something >> about doppler radar being a source of hypoxia, oxygen free radicals and the >> death of nearby animal and plant life. You also have a theory of dark >> matter, and a hunch that dark matter is indirectly responsible for the >> conclusions concerning doppler radar that you arrive at in your informal >> research. >> >> On the connection to dark matter, I personally have no opinion. I am >> skeptical, however, that your research is sufficient to establish any kind >> of linkage between the effects of doppler radar and dark matter, however. >> In light of this doubt, I think you might be able to get your >> investigation into doppler radar out to a wider audience if you did not >> combine it with the question of dark matter. Adding dark matter into the >> mix asks too much of people in their suspension of disbelief for them to be >> able to give much credibility to your doppler radar hunch, even if both >> hunches ended up being true. >> >> Eric >> >> >> >> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:55 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Radar/Call Sign MHT Model ASR-9 Max Pulsed Power (Watts) 1,300,000 Gain >>> (dBi) 34 Frequency (MHz) 2,800 RPM 12.5 Max Power Density (W/m2) @ 10 km >>> 10.39 Pulse Duration(uSec) 1.00 Pulse Repition Factor (Hz) 1,000 Range >>> Est. (Miles) 60 Latitude 42.937248 Longitude -71.437286 FIPS 33011 >>> County Hillsborough State NH >>> >> >>
