Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: You said once he was not technologically savvy and now you trust him. >
I do not trust him. I am saying that if he was telling the truth that they stole the trade secrets, he is unethical. If he was lying and they did not steal any secrets, he is crazy. By saying that, he frightened away customers and threw away millions of dollars of potential sales. He is not technologically savvy because he said that the cell temperature can be used to measure heat even when the flow rate is not known. That is incorrect. > And I keep wondering what these memos you are referring to. > I just told you: memos from me to Defkalion, and from other people to Defkalion. > If that's from NASA, I'd be suspicious since they give credit to a theory > that doesn't even make sense theoretically. > The memos had nothing to do with theory. They said only that manual tests of the flow and temperature were essential to confirm the claim. See, how easy can I make a theory? > Your "theory" is not based on any evidence. My claims are based on memos that I and others sent to Defkalion, and statements published by Xanthoulis in the mass media. So, your "theory" is hot air without a shred of supporting evidence, and what I am telling you are irrefutable facts. There is a big difference. I am not going to respond to your nonsense again. You are free to have the last word. - Jed
