If DGT terminated the joint venture to the financial disadvantage of Mose, then Mose should take DGT to court to recover damages by presenting proof of such damages.
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: > > He said measuring the temperature of the cell. He doesn't say on what >> conditions. You assume with flow. >> > > He was talking about the ICCF18 demonstration, in which flow calorimetry > was used. He was responding to the Gamberale report. Let me repeat the > quote: > > *I called Alexander Xanthoulis and asked* for a comment. He didn’t > dispute the result of the report but pointed out that the calorimetric > set-up at the Milan demo was not made by Defkalion but by Mose. Gamberale > confirmed this but explained that the set-up was made according to strict > instructions from Defkalion . . . > > *Finally Xanthoulis pointed out* that the flow calorimetry measurements > (measurement of thermal energy output by heating flowing water) were not > important, but that the most important measurements were on the bare > reactor, calculating the output thermal energy by measuring temperatures on > various points of the reactor without heating any water (you then use a law > called Stefan–Boltzmann > law<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan%E2%80%93Boltzmann_law>). > He told me that these measurements had been sent to Gamberale twice. > This seems to imply there were a separate set of tests without flowing > water, and without heating water. I am not aware of such tests. Perhaps I > overlooked them. The graphs sent by Xanthoulis are uploaded at Lewan's > site. There is no indication on them when, where or how they were taken. I > assumed they were from the ICCF18 demonstration. > > It is a perfectly valid technique to measure the cell wall temperature > during flow calorimetry. I recommend you do that. > > - Jed >
