The same level of horse manure is what the investors behind Glenn Curtiss said. He didn't need to invent the airplane. He didn't need to know squat about it. He just needed to improve on what was presented. And he stole the rest. History shows him to be the con man, and the Wright brothers to be the true heroes who were wronged by his patent abuses.
There will be no doubt another terrible patent war surrounding LENR. Butmby next year, everyone knows that Rossi is the one who pushed this technology into open. Not the guys who admitted to stealing Rossi's secret. On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > The handful of partners who will initially invest in the DGT technology > will be entering into a joint venture where the partners will be evaluating > much more than the technology. > > These partners will be looking at DGT as an organization that will be > capable of providing continuing improvements to their nascent cold fusion > technology over many years into the intermediate future at the forefront of > that LENR science. > > These partners will be capable of testing DGT and adapting these systems > to meet their own needs and evolving those systems to meet there current > and future product requirements. > > DGT must be able to explain the finest and most obscure points of LENR > science within a framework of a new unified scientific paradigm. > > The partners who do due diligence will evaluate the key personnel of DGT > to insure that this technical and management team will provide cutting edge > science into the indefinite future. > > This management will also include the security and intellectual protection > of the HEMI technology which will insure a vanguard position in the field > of LENR both now and into the foreseeable future. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> In procurement of systems, it is the buyer's responsibility to do due >>> diligence: >>> >> >> This argument seems to be a different one than one in which DGT is held >> to be basically sound but misunderstood. In this line of reasoning, it >> would seem that DGT are free to do whatever they like, including squirly >> business practices that approach fraud, and it is up to potential investors >> to make sure they know what they're getting into. This does not seem like >> a promising approach to exonerating DGT. >> >> Eric >> >> >
