And Rossi stole Piantelli's secrets...
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>wrote: > The same level of horse manure is what the investors behind Glenn Curtiss > said. He didn't need to invent the airplane. He didn't need to know squat > about it. He just needed to improve on what was presented. And he stole > the rest. History shows him to be the con man, and the Wright brothers to > be the true heroes who were wronged by his patent abuses. > > There will be no doubt another terrible patent war surrounding LENR. > Butmby next year, everyone knows that Rossi is the one who pushed this > technology into open. Not the guys who admitted to stealing Rossi's secret. > > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The handful of partners who will initially invest in the DGT technology >> will be entering into a joint venture where the partners will be evaluating >> much more than the technology. >> >> These partners will be looking at DGT as an organization that will be >> capable of providing continuing improvements to their nascent cold fusion >> technology over many years into the intermediate future at the forefront of >> that LENR science. >> >> These partners will be capable of testing DGT and adapting these systems >> to meet their own needs and evolving those systems to meet there current >> and future product requirements. >> >> DGT must be able to explain the finest and most obscure points of LENR >> science within a framework of a new unified scientific paradigm. >> >> The partners who do due diligence will evaluate the key personnel of DGT >> to insure that this technical and management team will provide cutting edge >> science into the indefinite future. >> >> This management will also include the security and intellectual >> protection of the HEMI technology which will insure a vanguard position in >> the field of LENR both now and into the foreseeable future. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> In procurement of systems, it is the buyer's responsibility to do due >>>> diligence: >>>> >>> >>> This argument seems to be a different one than one in which DGT is held >>> to be basically sound but misunderstood. In this line of reasoning, it >>> would seem that DGT are free to do whatever they like, including squirly >>> business practices that approach fraud, and it is up to potential investors >>> to make sure they know what they're getting into. This does not seem like >>> a promising approach to exonerating DGT. >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> >> >
