I've asked Charles if he'd seen/heard of any new arguments since he wrote the book (beside Shanahan of course). He said he had seen/heard of none.
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > after reading the book of Beaudette, who clearly investigated better than > me until 2001, I started to ask for any non refuted/addressed critic agains > F&P calorimetry, and I will add agains followers. > > According to beaudette there is only 4 critics : > - Lewis who claim the cell is not well stirred > - hansen who claim there is huge recombination > - morrison who abuse hypnotics mushrooms (dissolved gas, huge thermal > gradient) > - Wilsons who raised good point, refuted Hansen and Lewis, but could not > ruleout excess heat in biggest event. > > There is also recent (2000+) Shanahan article, which was discussed here. > The defense was well done, even if I follow the rebuttal position, so best > is not to cover it. > > is there other serious arguments that beaudette have overlooked... > or new critics ? > > no skeptic was able to even deliver one of the Fantastic Four articles. > they seems to believe based on pure buzz, and trust in authorities... not > even, basing their position on bad article. > > as could say Spock, "Fascinating!" >
