http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/06/17/the-clue-is-in-the-goo/
I think I figured out all of these Governmental Pulsed Microwave/RF radars are just Water Softeners on Steroids Sent from a plane going 500 MPH somewhere over the Gulf of Mexico On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:51 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey, > > June 21st is my birfday, I will be 50, which kinda sucks because I still > act 18. I will make the claim in advance that the Earth is not really > round, it is a 6-D vacuum torus with a glob of baryonic decay around it > that we play in. > > Stewart > > > On Wednesday, June 18, 2014, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Bob Cook >> >> I am not so sure that Rossi is completely wrong…. If the >> first step is to create heavy electrons that facilitate the reaction of a >> proton with a Ni nucleus, Rossi may be correct. >> >> Bob, >> >> Normally we expect that the inventor understands his device, but you are >> aware of the problems with that view - has anything changed? >> >> There is no known nuclear reaction of nickel which produces only stable >> isotopes as ash, and no reaction with a proton to go to copper which >> matches >> the facts- which are no gammas and no radioactive isotopes, and with no >> disproportion of isotopes compared to natural ratios. >> >> The Swedes already did isotope analysis of the copper in the ash (which is >> definitely there at about 10%) and found the isotope ratio was completely >> natural, with no radioactivity and no indication of transmutation. They >> concluded that the copper (and iron) was there initially. They found no >> light elements. >> >> Of course, one can invent another miracle, besides the first miracle of >> nuclear fusion, and assert that not only does proton-addition happen, but >> it >> is a new kind of fusion reaction, previously unknown to physics which >> creates only stable isotopes; but then the third miracle is the isotope >> ratio, which must remain completely natural. That is three miracles >> required. >> >> Many of Rossi’s supporters will not rule out nickel to copper, despite >> “conservation of miracles”, since the inventor believes it to be true and >> he >> should be given benefit of doubt. FWIW - my view is that Rossi does not >> understand his own invention, nor do the top experts like Ed Storms. It >> simply cannot involve transmutation of nickel to copper or the fusion of >> protons to deuterium (which will eventually produce tritium, which is >> absent). The Swedes ran it for 6 months, and they will have lots of >> tritium >> to show us - if this is what Ed Storms believes it to be. >> >> But after 6 months if there is no substantial tritium then there is no >> hydrogen fusion at all, and we must look for other explanations. >> >> I am still optimistic for a Saturday release of the report. It is the >> midsummer holiday in Sweden and June 21 was the date in 1633 when Galileo >> was forced by the Inquisition to abjure his Copernican views… a fitting >> day >> for any pariah to confront the mainstream stance. >> >> >>
