Conservation of heat is not seen as independent of other forms of energy. Where are people getting these ideas?
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Terry Blanton <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > > What if ... > > Frank Grimer remains active on the Bessler Wheel forum. Today he posted: > > "Physics only deals in second derivative of motion when it comes to > generating energy from gravity. Goodness me. I really have discovered > something. The third derivative is not seen as energy at all. No > wonder there's been no progress. The conservation of angular momentum > is not seen as the conservation of an independent energy - independent > in the same way as the conservation of heat is seen as an independent > form of energy. So if jerk is generated and transferred it never > appears in the second derivative books as it passes from one object to > another. Yikes!! > > When people look at RAR Mark 2 all they see is a weight going around a > closed path and they "know" (or they think they know) that no energy > is to be obtained that way." > > And then there was jounce: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jounce > >
