Who will judge the bet is won ? Nature, Science ? the problem is that in the case the report is positive based on the experimental results : - first the testers will weaken their language , like they already did, to avoid commiting, whatever is the result. - second the skeptics will just say "no it is not true" and they will win the bet... because Nature, Science, APS will confirm...
you should rather bet on something opposable like : an announce by a big companies (how many billions sales?>10bn?), who never communicate on LENR (list in th bet the companies to exclude), they are funding research in LENR... or a client who communicates. NB: is Cherokee not a client since they bought the technology ? 2014-06-22 0:02 GMT+02:00 Patrick Ellul <[email protected]>: > Hi guys, > > I'm not too sure how it would work, but here it goes anyway. > > I don't think that there is anyone in this world who would bet that the > reported COP will be < 2, not even the skeptics, as they believe that the > report will be wrong or faked. > > > https://www.betmoose.com/bet/result-of-independent-test-of-rossi-ecat-2014-240 > > Regards. > Patrick > >
