On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Patrick Ellul <[email protected]> wrote:
> ... not even the skeptics, as they believe that the report will be wrong > or faked. > > ***It is amazing how far the skeptopaths go to deny. To have the report be wrong would mean that 7 independent PhD scientists cannot read a friggin thermometer. And for it to be faked, it means that Rossi is the greatest con artist in history. So great that he can mesmerize 7 PhDs for 6 months while he's even on a different CONTINENT, never on site for those several months. The skeptopathic argument is getting to argumentum ad absurdum. I know that you're right, that they'll say exactly such things. I just wish there was a way to set up a contract at betmoose that would be tightly defined enough to pay out when these skeptopaths actually do it. I don't see how. One would have to identify individual skeptopaths across the internet, bet on them actually responding (or perhaps just staying silent) and not really being aware that their actions would trigger a payout.
