Hi all and especially Jed who know all which was written...

The doctoral thesis of Olga Dmitriyeva  have been found and interpreted as
avidence challenging all LENr calorimetry

http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/06/23/doctoral-thesis-concludes-pons-fleischmann-effect-artefact-of-chemical-reaction/

after reading quicly the thesis it seems not at al a general rebuttal but a
warning agains some pitfal about D/H exchange heat, about hotspot in gas
loading experiments.

positively she concluded that Pd baking was an important point, and that
calorimetry (flow?) should be prefered to thermometry
(static/isoperibolic?).

she also concluded that her finding did not apply to wet cell (too few heat
dor D/H , and better mixing with fluid).

Warthog told that D/H is a long time well known artifact, that newcommers
and skeptics rediscover regularly because they don't have read all.

Can someone more competent check if my arguments/interpretation are good ?

is there other papers on D/H exchange heat ?

and is there a list of those "beware of artifact" papers, to present to
skeptic, to show it is not a believers community, but a scientific
community...

Reply via email to