Unfortunately all the 3 pro-cold fusion FQXI essays (by Jed, Kevin and me) have been down-voted by the community of participants- a Pareto issue (80% honest, 20 % dishonest) and did not made it to the pool of 40 (from 153) of potential winners. As regarding MFMP they represent a great initiative and a noble alternative of how research is made, however for development the Montecuccoli stuff decides. Our young colleagues have received only 4.6% of the funding they need.
Peter On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > I figure this was worth some self-promotion at the FQXI essay contest. > After all, how many other essay contestants were seeking to highlight an > organization that got nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize DURING THE > CONTEST? > > > *Author Kevin O\'Malley* wrote on Jun. 28, 2014 @ 06:17 GMT > stub <http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/enstub/103563> > Humanity would be steered properly by taking notice of this development. > No one else can claim that the organization they were seeking to highlight > in this essay contest was IN THE SAME TIME FRAME highlighted by the Nobel > Peace Prize process. > > r <http://fqxi.org/community/forum/post/report/103354> > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
