I BELIEVE YOU. I think this place is crawling with it, especially over our heads, uncurling in the atmosphere, bending and lensing and attenuating light and Doppler microwave radiation and RF. Space is all puckered up. We are creatures of the quantum vacuum.
Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > The is about a half-dozen indicators that LENR is dark matter, and there is > a good chance that this dark matter is producing the dark energy that is > expanding the universe. > > I am dishartend that my posts on this dark issue are not convincing, but > recupitualtion is my game > > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I don't mind the Mills hypothesis. I wouldn't be shocked if it was >> correct. You can even tell Storms has a begrudging respect for it. I like >> the Meulenberg-Sinha take on it as well. There was an article form last year >> I believe in JCMNS that explores the DDL in depth. Meulenberg seemed to >> think it was important. You might find it worthwhile considering your >> interest in the subject. I just think there are some serious problems with >> the model as well -- such as the instability issue. >> >> CF-LENR I think would be an even more amazing story if it ended up >> granting insight into dark matter and such. I just wouldn't proclaim that >> too loudly at this point -- it's not exactly a credibility-generating >> maneuver at this awkward time in CF-LENR's present development & image. >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> If there is a real DDL species in LENR (hydrogen isomer with electron >>> orbital at less than 10 Fermi), even if it is a transitory species with a >>> lifetime of only nanoseconds, then there is a way for nickel to provide >>> the >>> thermal gain, by spin coupling with no fusion required. In fact, if there >>> is >>> such a DDL species, chances are that it could be a transitory oscillator, >>> such that the rate of oscillation is resonant with the phonon rate of >>> nickel. >>> >>> Rice and Kim show here that the DDL is not stable for extended periods. >>> They >>> do not show that the DDL is impossible... >>> http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RiceRAcommentsona.pdf >>> but they also demonstrate that they do not understand Mills' CQM theory >>> >>> To overcome the objections to the DDL, and to nickel spin coupling, >>> please >>> consider all of these points as a package, and not individually. Back in >>> early 2011, we talked about the final revision of the Rossi patent >>> filing. >>> In his application Rossi's bets everything on Ni62 as THE important >>> reactant >>> - US 2011/0005506. His reasoning could be incorrect, but it is likely >>> that >>> Rossi tested pure isotopes and found that Ni-62 was indeed the active >>> isotope. >>> >>> Otherwise Rossi would not have bet the farm on one isotope, since ... if >>> he >>> is wrong on that single detail he has lost all protection against >>> infringement. QUOTE from application: "Accordingly, it is indispensable >>> to >>> use, for the above mentioned exothermal reactions, a nickel isotope >>> having a >>> mass number of 62". That pretty much says it all when we consider the >>> properties of this isotope (and if we ignore Rossi's reasoning in the >>> patent >>> for why this isotope works). He could be "right for the wrong reason". >>> >>> BTW - the patent was granted in Europe to his wife Maddalena Pascucci, >>> who >>> is an attorney, and presumably had good advice on patent law - but again >>> - >>> the US application is not granted. However, the USA is a signator to the >>> PCT >>> so Pascucci could get protection here for the nickel-62 part - and >>> perhaps >>> for little else. >>> >>> Why Ni-62 ... and why bet the farm? >>> >>> Nickel-62 is at the very pinnacle of stability - having the highest >>> binding >>> energy per nucleon in the entire Periodic Table (8.8 MeV). There is no >>> more >>> stable isotope known to science. This binding stability would actually >>> prohibit it from participating in proton nuclear fusion reactions, as >>> Rossi >>> suggested, but would allow spin energy (part of the binding energy) to be >>> coupled and depleted - simply because there is plenty to spare. Too bad >>> that >>> he did not realize this distinction. BTW - it is duly noted that other >>> nickel and iron isotopes have very high binding energy as well, but a lot >>> of >>> weight goes to Rossi's testing of isotopes against each other. >>> >>> That is what is meant by Rossi being "right for the wrong reason" >>> >>> This stability of Ni-62, combined with ferromagnetism is especially >>> relevant >>> for the combination of a strong magnet with a material which cannot be >>> saturated; and the DDL, with an effective field strength at the 10 Fermi >>> level in the range of giga-T (billions of Tesla) is that strong magnet. >>> Deraz - claims there is no saturation level for NiO, and even if doubts >>> are >>> warranted on that particular point, it could be important in the context >>> of >>> spin coupling to find an extreme level of saturation capability, with >>> which >>> to mate with giga-T fields. The result is spin coupling. >>> www.electrochemsci.org/papers/vol7/7054608.pdf >>> >>> In short, as of now, with dozens of alternative theories floating around >>> for >>> the gain in Ni-H, the best emerging scenario - from my perspective seems >>> to >>> be one which is >>> 1) No fusion occurs in Ni-H. It is a different beast that Pd-D. >>> 2) But the gain is Nuclear, in the sense of mass conversion into >>> energy >>> 3) It is Nanomagnetic in the sense that spin energy is involved at >>> small geometry >>> 4) Probably involves a transitory version of the DDL, which >>> oscillates >>> at IR frequency, due to SPP interaction at the top and spin coupling at >>> the >>> bottom, such that the collapse and reinflation are slightly asymmetric in >>> energy >>> 5) Thus there is net heat. >>> 6) The gain comes mostly from Ni-62 by spin coupling to its high >>> level >>> of composite spin, >>> 7) Oxygen if present in the nickel in small amounts could allow >>> increased saturation capability >>> 8) It is not clear if the Ni-62 gives up some of its own mass, or is >>> a >>> gateway to the Dirac "sea" ... Either way, this is LENR but it is also >>> "non-fusion LENR" >>> >>> Any and all of these suggestion are subject to change as soon as better >>> data >>> arrives. All we can do now is look at the big picture as being shadows on >>> Plato's cave. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
