The point I wanted to make regarding Mizuno was that energy transfer is a full duplex process. In other words, energy can flow in either direction: from the soliton to the reaction or from the reaction to the soliton. There is no gamma's involved in either direction when the soliton is a member of a global BEC.
When the volume of the reaction is covered by the magnetic field projected by the soliton, energy transfer occurs without gamma. More than one reaction can occur if the magnetic field that covers the volume in which all the many reactions occur is very strong. In the Mizuno experiment, protium is formed in a fission reaction that needs energy to happen. On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil-- > > I am not sure about Mizuno. I do not remember reading anything about > gammas being observed as least as input to the experiment. I assumed he > also realized only small energy changes. Its the lack of gammas that > indicate other small energy quanta transfers are occurring. > > Bob > > Sent from Windows Mail > > *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, July 24, 2014 10:28 PM > *To:* [email protected] > > What happens in the endothermic energy case where energy is delivered to > enable the reaction. As in Mizuno, when deuterium becomes podium. Is the > energy delivered as a gamma ray or is it sent over in discrete low energy > quanta? > > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >>> Why focus on the Coulomb field? Focus on the intense magnetic fields >>> that can polarize nuclei parallel and antiparallel and cause them to spin >>> in harmony. Transfer of mass via spin energy is possible, although it is >>> not common in a plasma or free particle system most are familiar with. >>> Solid state lattices allow more options for interactions including spin >>> coupling. >> >> >> The Coulomb field is more intuitively accessible to me at this point, and >> an ion core presents a huge surface of charge to impart energy to (in >> addition to any nearby electrons). I get the impression that spin coupling >> is like trying to go fast on a ten-speed bike, but using only the lowest >> gear. No matter how fast you pedal the pedals, energy is still going to be >> translated into motion of the bike only very slowly. This might just be a >> misimpression on my part. As I learn more about nuclear spin, perhaps its >> potential as a conduit will become apparent. >> >> >> Gammas are not necessary for mass conversion to thermal kinetic energy. >> >> >> I think we agree on this point. What's needed is to transfer the energy >> of the decay of a compound nucleus to the environment in a benign way >> (assuming we have fusion, as I do). Since we don't see gammas, I assume >> that energy is imparted through some other mechanism. >> >> Eric >> >> >
