Dear Stefan, BLP plays in an other league than LENR , it is kind of hyper-chemisity. Perhaps my ancient paper could help you to get the holistic vision:
http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/archive/ci/31/i10/html/10vp.html *Technologically*, Randy must solve a very *wicked problem *to convert a batch, i.e. discontinuous ultrafast process in a continuous one, as to obtain tamed electric current from lightnings. He has tried many variants- the one chosen now has great chances to succeed- but only with very hard work. It is completely unrealistic to speak about competition in New Energy- you will see tens of rather different LENR and non-LENR processes going commercial. Peter On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < [email protected]> wrote: > I don't think that hydrinos is behind LENR. It do look like in FP > experiment you get a stronger effect if you use deutrium. So then I would > expect that it is a nuclear reaction no? Anyway as people have suggested > and Mills also acknowledge nuclear reactions can probably be triggered via > hydrino formation. On the other hand assuming hydinos exists, the field > blurries, is it LENR if you don't find any tritium helium and radiation > while using H20. > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
