part of the current tragedy of science is all kind of mainstream media http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJcoldfusion.pdf#page=4 first of all scientific journalists, then science tabloid (science, nature, Cells), then influential mainstream media (NYT)...
don't look further, consensus is manufactured. see recent affairs... WMD is just de detail if you compare to current manufacture of consensus. cold fusion fiasco is an example of something I see recently and that CIA have well theorized, if you lie at the beginning of an affair, it became the consensus. for a mainstream story like a crash you have to lie for 24h and media follow... for science 2month is enough. then no evidence can change the truth of the journalists. NO EVIDENCE CAN! except the one that reach the heart of each citizen independently, and based on his selfish interest or concrete observation. the tea kettle fallacy is the only truth. 2014-08-02 17:23 GMT+02:00 Alan Fletcher <[email protected]>: > What a surprise : Jennifer Ouellette comes out against it > Physics Week in Review: August 2, 2014 > http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cocktail-party-physics/2014/08/02/physics-week-in-review-august-2-2014/ > Perhaps your interest was piqued by the news that a Fuel-Less Space Drive > with “Q-Thrusters” > <http://www.popsci.com/article/technology/fuel-less-space-drive-may-actually-work-says-nasa> > May Actually Work, meaning that it might one day be possible to travel > through space without filling up the gas tank, so to speak. Per Wired > <http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-07/31/nasa-validates-impossible-space-drive>: > “Either the results are completely wrong, or NASA has confirmed a major > breakthrough in space propulsion.” The Time Lord’s money is on the latter. > Via Twitter, he declared that the notion of “Propulsive momentum transfer > via the quantum vacuum virtual plasma” is nonsensical sub-*Star-Trek* > level technobabble <http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140006052>. (You > may as well put your faith in “Red Matter.”) > > But I think she has a typo ... "The Time Lord’s money is on the latter." > -- where "latter" is "breakthrough". > >
