Yes: Paradox indicates that our 3D logic parameters indeed only 'seem' to elicite paradox since we are simultaneously(via transtemperal Casimir destortions) NEEDING TO CROSS CORRELATE seeming 'Through the Looking Glass' A-Dark Tachyonic Super Fluid.
*Ha* CROSS CORRELATING a hypothesized DARK ENERGY Tachyonic Super Fluid parallel space is easier said than done since we have no WALDO to reach across the PLASMA BREACH whether at nano-level or at MACRO REACTOR LEVEL. . . AT THE CASIMIR BORDER On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Roarty, Francis X <[email protected] > wrote: > On Sunday August 3 Jack said [snip] * * * FOR EXAMPLE: Identicle Twins > are QUANTUM-ENTANGLED. . . via Torsion-Wave TRANS HYPERSPACE Spooky Action > the same as nano sub-atomic particles and our QUANTUM-ENTANGLED CEREBRAL > CORTEX'S. [/snip] > > > > Jack, I believe Paradox twins experience the same difference in space time > as exotic forms of hydrogen experience when suppressed by changes in nano > geometry / lattice defects or tapestries of cavities formed when bulk > conductive nano powders are packed together. Some day the relationship > between the Casimir formula and the time dilation formula will be proved… I > also think the magnetic field will be corralled into this such that the > missing parameter in these anomalous claims is finally visible.. I think > the Sawyer endorsement by NASA may mean there is a magnetic/geometrical > component that we are missing –Many researchers endorse resonance in these > cavities but could the macro shape of the reactor itself be part of the > puzzle as to why some experiments are so hard to reproduce? Maybe it is > time to shotgun the parameters in our search for results with identical > powders in a dozens of reactor shapes and even the pill used to form the > powders in different shapes. I have always posited that the anomalous > energy comes from plying different forces at different scales of nature > against herself to perform work on the gas atoms loaded into the metal > lattice or powders- previously I thought the quantum averages of > geometrical regions that form a tapestry were in opposition to the > “randomness” of gas motion.. that is to say random motion becomes usable > energy when you can restrain any spatial axis on a small enough scale > –which physics teaches us you can’t in the normal 3d isotropy –BUT- Paradox > twins are an example of 2 different inertial frames where the 3D spatial > frames are rotated from each other causing time dilation from each other’s > perspective, IF an equal difference in vacuum pressure can be created via > suppression in the nano regions created by these powders then you have > random motion that is spatially unbalanced allowing for random motion to be > harnessed / preventing cancellation in our dimension but changing the > vector of virtual particles exiting our plane. > > Fran > > >
