Regarding the excerpt from the patent.

*The at least one electron-donor material is selected from the group
consisting of: Cs, Ba, Sr, Rb, Li, Na, Ca, K, Fr, Ra, in particular this
electron-donor material is Cesium. *

If you remember, Cesium was my pick for the  Rossi's secret sauce because
it is a metal with a very low vaporization temperature (671 °C). Cesium
will produce nanoparticles when the temperature is brought below 671C.

The other elements like lithium will need to vaporize over 1000C. My guess
is that these elements were included to cover every possible base and are
impractical in a working reactor because of the high temperatures necessary
needed utilize them.

On the other hand, subatomic particle irradiation is used to create the
plasma so it might be possible to vaporize these other elements using
subatomic particle collisions in localized hot spots.





On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

> Regarding the excerpt from the patent.
>
> *A list of deposition methods suitable for obtaining the cluster structure
> is shown in patent application WO2010058288.0 another exemplary embodiment,
> alternative, the active core can comprise a transition metal in the form of
> particles as powder, dissolved or sintered. Active core 18 can then be
> formed in such a way that it shows the clusters on its surface. In
> particular, the core can comprise a support material on which the clusters
> are deposited or formed. The transition metal can be deposited by a
> deposition process selected among a chemical process, an electrolytic
> process, a spraying process, a sputtering process and other processes, and
> a combination thereof.*
>
> Micro? Particles are deposited on a nickel substructure (a bar?). This
> provides the static NAE that all reactors need to get going.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Regarding the excerpt from the patent.
>>
>> *More in detail, during the process of orbital capture, H- ions can lose
>> its own couple of electrons and form protons 1H+. A first fraction of the
>> protons 1H+ is subjected to direct nuclear capture reactions by the nuclei
>> of the same atoms of the clusters in which the orbital capture has
>> occurred, while a second fraction of the protons 1H+ can be expelled by
>> Coulomb repulsion from the nucleus of the metal atom where the orbital
>> capture has taken place. The expelled protons have an energy that can be
>> determined and characterised. For instance, in the case of Nickel, this
>> energy is about 6.7 MeV, as detected by a Wilson chamber, on the basis of
>> Bethe's equation. A part of the protons of the second portion, which does
>> not react with other nuclei of the primary material, can leave the latter
>> and interact with a material adapted to give rise to proton- dependent
>> reactions, if this is present. *
>>
>> A cooper pair of protons enters the transition metal nucleus, one
>> is captured an the other is expelled carrying 6.7 MeV which is the excess
>> binding energy.
>>
>> The proton pair has a spin of zero. which is consistent with magnetic
>> interaction with protons. The same magnetic glue has just be found to
>> produce cooper pairs of electrons in superconductors is found in Ni/H. The
>> Magnetic field in the Ni/H reaction is far stronger than can be found in
>> superconductors so there is no high temperature falloff.
>>
>> I would strongly suspect that the expelled proton is not seen when the
>> reactor is in operation. Such an experimental  detail should not appear in
>> the patent because it is not part of the reaction mechanism of an
>> operational reactor. The 6.7 MeV would be thermalized by BEC formation in
>> the operational reactor, IMHO.
>>
>> To see the 6.7 MeV, the nickel must be removed from the influence of the
>> BEC and placed in a cloud chamber after a considerable amount of time.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Ron Kita <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings All,
>>>
>>> I just saw this on Alain Coetmeur s Scoop.it website.
>>>
>>> Not sure IF it made it to Vortex.....yet:
>>> http://www.scoop.it/t/lenr-revolution-in-process-cold-fusion
>>>
>>> Ad astra,
>>> Ron
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to