This is actually a significant paper. The author discovered NEGATIVE Coulomb drag resistance.
Discovery of negative one-dimensional Coulomb drag occurring at high electronic density in the wires Results concerning the negative Coulomb drag were published as original work with DL appearing as the rst author (D. Laroche, et al. , Nature Nanotechnol. 6 , 793 (2011).). However, recent obser- vation of an unpredicted low-density negative one-dimensional Coulomb drag signal [19] shows that our understanding of one-dimensional systems, and espe- cially of Coulomb drag between one-dimensional systems, is far from complete First, we have discovered a novel high- density negative Coulomb drag signal at a speci c 1D subband occupancy in the wires, in addition to the already reported low-density negative Coulomb drag signal. An additional contribution to Coulomb drag arises from an electron-hole asymmetry in the density of state (and hence a di erent number of electrons and holes), yielding to a negative Coulomb drag signal etc... On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > A google search for "relative Luttinger Liquid" produces only 1 hit, a PhD > thesis worth looking at, perhaps applicable to LENR. > > Coulomb Drag in Vertically-Integrated > One-Dimensional Quantum Wires > > http://gervaislab.mcgill.ca/Laroche_PhD_Thesis.pdf > > > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Okay, then that introduces an interesting concept that I have not seen in >> the literature. I keep seeing it postulated here on Vortex that there's a >> relativity-based theory that explains it. I do not understand the theory >> so I haven't spent the cycles to click through and figure it out. >> >> But here we have the possibility of a "relative" Luttinger Liquid. I was >> thinking that the 1 dimensional Luttinger Liquid pushes into a 1D BEC at >> certain ABSOLUTE temperatures. But what if Luttinger Liquids form at >> RELATIVE temperatures? Here in this case, it would be when a spark rapidly >> declines from 20,000C down to 10,000C. Even though the ABSolute >> temperature is momentarily high, the field of matter has been exposed to a >> RELative rapid temperature decrease. This adds a further complication to >> the formation of Luttinger Liquids and BECs. >> >> I have no idea how to pursue if anyone has investigated this. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Cools is a relative term. The temperature of a spark can reach about >>> 20,000C. For example, Palladium vaporizes above 3000C so nanoparticle of >>> palladium will start to form just under that very high temperature. Water >>> will always produce nanoparticles when exposed to a spark. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> A spark produces a plasma, whenever a plasma cools as it must >>>>> eventually do, at a minimum, it produces nanoparticles out of the >>>>> vaporized >>>>> electrode material that carried the spark.. >>>>> >>>> ***When a plasma COOLs???? That is utterly significant. It is only >>>> under "relatively cool" conditions that a BEC forms. So when the plasma >>>> cools, it forms a (linear) BEC, atoms come together and fuse sometimes and >>>> when they do, by the nature of BECs, their output energy is dissipated by >>>> 1/N the number of atoms involved in the BEC. >>>> >>>> On top of that, the spark environment becomes a (linear) accelerator, >>>> pushing particles such as protons straight into the opposing walls of the >>>> crack of the metal matrix, thereby generating transmutations, fission, >>>> nuclear heat from other products. Perhaps it's even an asymmetrical thrust >>>> capacitor, as described upthread. Think about it: A v-shaped "crack" is >>>> very similar to a capacitor in certain dimensions, and at the extremes of >>>> those dimensions you'd see very different behavior. >>>> >>>> Ed Storms wanted to move the discussion out from the interior of metal >>>> hydrydes into the surface "where the laws of conservation of energy no >>>> longer apply". But cracks are a weak representation of "laws of Physics" >>>> no longer applying: The sparks ACROSS such cracks would be a perfect >>>> candidate for "weird physics" and "laws of conservation of energy" no >>>> longer applying, because plasma physics is incredibly weird to begin with. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LochakGlowenergyn.pdf >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here is what cavitation is producing. These are what Ken Shoulders >>>>>>> also produced in spark discharge. Sparks in water always produce >>>>>>> cavitation. Only cavitation in water produces gamma because no BEC can >>>>>>> be produced. >>>>>>> >>>>>> ***This strikes me as incredibly important because we've narrowed >>>>>> down the focus of discussion to sparks, BECs, gamma ray production and >>>>>> LENR. HOW is it that sparks in water always produce cavitation? Can a >>>>>> linear BEC form in gas simpler than in water? Isn't it possible for a >>>>>> spark to form a Luttinger Liquid linear BEC? And consider the endpoints >>>>>> of >>>>>> such a phenomenon: at each end would be a few microns of solid Ni or Pd >>>>>> encapsulating a linear formation of H or D atoms! The reason it's so >>>>>> hard >>>>>> to get our heads around it is that there are 2 kinds of phenomena >>>>>> connecting to each other: A 1dimensional Luttinger Liquid of atoms >>>>>> embedded within a matrix connected to a BEC forming inside of a spark >>>>>> across (Ed Storms's utterly important) crack or even just a "sphericule". >>>>>> The TRANSITION between these 2 uncommon physical forms is completely >>>>>> beyond >>>>>> our grasp to describe. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Sparks in a gas do not produce gamma because the spark produces >>>>>>> nanoparticle aggregations in which a BEC is carried. >>>>>>> >>>>>> ***Okay... where do these nanoparticle aggregations come from? I've >>>>>> never heard of them before. What are they? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
