Bob:

In the reference that I sited, the last column in the list is titled as
follows:

"electric quadrupole moment in bar"'

You notice that for a zero spin element, the quadrupole moment is zero.


On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 2:37 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Axil--
> Your comments about zero spin means zero quadrupole spin  seems  founded
> relative to Daniel’s comment.  I am not sure what you mean by quadrupole
> spin?  Daniel was talking about quadrupole and octapole moments of a
> nucleus.
>
> I would argue that a nucleus with a nominal ground state with 0 spin could
> be excited to a higher  spin state as Daniel has suggested.
>
> What  leads you to consider that such ground states cannot be excited to
> higher and potentially unstable spin states.   I would say that in the
> presence of a magnetic field of high strength and an appropriate resonant
> frequency, that such ground state nuclei with 0 spin could be excited to
> higher spin energy states.  I think the standard theory which includes
> quarks with various intrinsic spins could respond to such energy inputs and
> result in a unstable nuclei.
>
> Bob
>
> Sent from Windows Mail
>
> *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* ‎Thursday‎, ‎August‎ ‎7‎, ‎2014 ‎6‎:‎04‎ ‎PM
> *To:* [email protected]
>
> *You should also check out the quadrupole and octopole moments. The
> nucleus can also bounces in more complicated ways and emit RF. *
>
>
> http://www.easyspin.org/documentation/isotopetable.html
>
> Zero spin also means zero quadrupole spin.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> You should also check out the quadrupole and octopole moments. The
>> nucleus can also bounces in more complicated ways and emit RF.
>>
>>
>> 2014-08-06 17:29 GMT-03:00 Axil Axil <[email protected]>:
>>
>>
>>> The reason why zero spins work and non zero spins don't in LENR is that
>>> NMR active (non zero spin) nuclei wastes energy by converting that magnetic
>>> power into RF.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Rocha - RJ
>> [email protected]
>>
>
>

Reply via email to