Hank Mills August 6th, 2014 at 9:12 PM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=853&cpage=7#comment-985049>
Dear Andrea, Could you please tell us a little more about the electromagnetic fields detected from your device? They have nothing to do with the upcoming report which is only measuring heat production, so I hope you can share just a bit of info. For example: 1 – What form of EM fields are you measuring? Magnetic? Electrostatic? 2 – Where are they detected? Inside the reactor? Outside? 3 – What is the strength of the field in Tesla, if it is a magnetic field? 4 – Is it pulsing or constant? My dream would be that you could design a low temp E-Cat that would produce pulsing magnetic fields outside of the reactor. If this was the case, you could wrap a coil of copper wire around it and convert the magnetism to electricity. I can imagine such a solid state E-Cat being used to power an RF cavity thruster so we could colonize the solar system. Andrea Rossi August 7th, 2014 at 8:31 AM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=853&cpage=7#comment-985189> Hank Mills: In this period I am exclusively focused on the 1 MW plant, therefore the issue of the e.m. fields detected is not at the moment on the top of the spear. This is an issue that we do not consider consolidated, more complex research has to be done to say anything important about it. Anyway, based on what we made: 1- electrostatic 2- outside the reactor, inside the E-Cat, not outside the E-Cat 3- see 1 4- pulsing Warning: this all could be wrong. Consistent R&D is necessary before saying anything decisive. Warm Regards, A.R. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- It looks to me like DGT is far ahead on this issue. Rossi has something going on inside his reactor that he does not yet know what it is. On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Dave Lafleur > > August 3rd, 2014 at 4:06 PM > If you are finding a magnetic byproduct as well that is certainly > interesting. You had no mention of magnetic materials. Care to comment? > Should I be surprised if you find a monopole mechanism? I apologize for my > questions with no (known?) answers but you sir are a mad scientist and > enjoy your blog. I believe that skepticism is healthy but positive or > negative this would be a better world if more scientists were asking your > questions. > > Andrea Rossi > August 3rd, 2014 at 4:29 PM > Dave Lafleur: > It is not exactly as you wrote. We have found as an unexpected phenomenon > the direct production of electromagnetic energy. This is an issue we are > making R&D upon, but, sincerely, in this period my focus is on the 1 MW > plant of the new US Customer. I agree about what you say in regard of > scepticism. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > >
