Ecco Liberation August 7th, 2014 at 4:01 PM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=853&cpage=8#comment-985281> Dr. Rossi: I figured that since a Hot Cat already is a thermal hazard under working conditions (as its surface temperature peaks at several hundreds °C), having electrical insulation for the static electricity it apparently generates would have been kind of redundant as one would get a bad burn before possibly getting electrocuted. I meant that hypothetically speaking – where safety is not #1 priority – referring to an exposed, uninsulated inner core. I do get your point, though. Thanks, E.L.
Andrea Rossi August 7th, 2014 at 3:31 PM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=853&cpage=8#comment-985278> Ecco Liberation: The external surface of the Hot-Cat is electrically insulated, for obvious safety reasons. Currents are out of the reaction but inside the Hot Cat. If you touch any external part of the Hot Cat you do not feel any current nor measure any electromagnetic emission. Warm Regards A.R. ------------------------------------------------------------- This tells me that DGT has a more powerful reaction than Rossi has. DGT has EMF emissions that is not contained even with double shielding, but Rossi's EMF is weak enough to contain. As always, my judgment holds if Rossi is telling the truth and he may not be to protect his interests. On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Hank Mills > August 6th, 2014 at 9:12 PM > <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=853&cpage=7#comment-985049> > > Dear Andrea, > > Could you please tell us a little more about the electromagnetic fields > detected from your device? They have nothing to do with the upcoming report > which is only measuring heat production, so I hope you can share just a bit > of info. For example: > > 1 – What form of EM fields are you measuring? Magnetic? Electrostatic? > > 2 – Where are they detected? Inside the reactor? Outside? > > 3 – What is the strength of the field in Tesla, if it is a magnetic field? > > 4 – Is it pulsing or constant? > My dream would be that you could design a low temp E-Cat that would > produce pulsing magnetic fields outside of the reactor. If this was the > case, you could wrap a coil of copper wire around it and convert the > magnetism to electricity. I can imagine such a solid state E-Cat being used > to power an RF cavity thruster so we could colonize the solar system. > > Andrea Rossi > August 7th, 2014 at 8:31 AM > <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=853&cpage=7#comment-985189> > > Hank Mills: > In this period I am exclusively focused on the 1 MW plant, therefore the > issue of the e.m. fields detected is not at the moment on the top of the > spear. This is an issue that we do not consider consolidated, more complex > research has to be done to say anything important about it. Anyway, based > on what we made: > 1- electrostatic > 2- outside the reactor, inside the E-Cat, not outside the E-Cat > 3- see 1 > 4- pulsing > Warning: this all could be wrong. Consistent R&D is necessary before > saying anything decisive. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > It looks to me like DGT is far ahead on this issue. Rossi has something > going on inside his reactor that he does not yet know what it is. > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dave Lafleur >> >> August 3rd, 2014 at 4:06 PM >> If you are finding a magnetic byproduct as well that is certainly >> interesting. You had no mention of magnetic materials. Care to comment? >> Should I be surprised if you find a monopole mechanism? I apologize for my >> questions with no (known?) answers but you sir are a mad scientist and >> enjoy your blog. I believe that skepticism is healthy but positive or >> negative this would be a better world if more scientists were asking your >> questions. >> >> Andrea Rossi >> August 3rd, 2014 at 4:29 PM >> Dave Lafleur: >> It is not exactly as you wrote. We have found as an unexpected >> phenomenon the direct production of electromagnetic energy. This is an >> issue we are making R&D upon, but, sincerely, in this period my focus is on >> the 1 MW plant of the new US Customer. I agree about what you say in regard >> of scepticism. >> Warm Regards, >> A.R. >> >> >
