I was joking. I am to old to be interested in a brand new venture. However I would do it if your numbers are right regardless of BLP. Good luck. On Aug 11, 2014 4:51 PM, "Jojo Iznart" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Your analysis is spot on. Even if I just get 10 years out of it, I > would make a killing. > > I am deploying this in the Philippines only. I am only interested in the > Philippine market. When I have at least one power plant in action and > generating revenue, I will license it to many people in different > countries. But I have to show a working plant lest I be called a fraud. I > have little patience in being called a fraud as I strive to be honest. > > > > Jojo > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 12, 2014 7:39 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Wave-powered design > > Sounds like you have a vehicle, Jojo. I think you will be years ahead of > BLP..Maybe I should license one here in Icalifornia? Sounds very good and > much closer to reality than any LENR device so far. Yes , in 2025 you might > be obsolete but that matters very little if you earned 5 cents per kWh out > of 100,000MWh. (an even billion? Correct?). > On Aug 11, 2014 3:04 PM, "Jojo Iznart" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes, the pumps does indeed only have a design lifetime of 10 years. If >> my materials last 10 year under seawater, they would have generated >> electricity at $0.0019/kwh. >> >> Regarding growth on the pumps....it's inconsequencial. It will not >> affect the functioning of the pumps. In fact, I am looking for ways to >> encourage growth on it to protect it from further damag and corrosion. >> >> >> >> Jojo >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:12 AM >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Wave-powered design >> >> Hello Jojo, >> My only experience comes from sailing and sale boats (aka a hole in the >> water a little joke among sailors). >> Having said that I am sure your calculations have merit from an >> engineer7ng point of view but I suspect your maintenance estimates are low. >> Things grow on your equipment. Material detoriates froom exposure >> saltwater. Currents move the equipment. Storms destroys pieces. >> I could continue but I mightbe to pessimistic. A gould idea should be to >> invole a warf, which builds commersial small vessels and get them to make >> sure they take precaution for the majority of the known problems to operate >> in seawater. My guess is that you need to replace your investment within 10 >> to 15 years. However, I am just an amateur. Good luck and check all the >> details. >> On Aug 10, 2014 5:24 PM, "Jojo Iznart" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Lennart, thanks for your comments. >>> >>> Can you please elaborate on what you mean by a "big hole". Do you mean >>> the maintenance expenditure would be expensive? If so, why do you think >>> that would be? Is it the corrosion of the materials? The labor cost in >>> maintaining it? The infrastrucuture cost? The deployment cost? In your >>> experience, where is the money pit? >>> >>> My system can be built for <$200-$230/kw, producing electricity at >>> around $0.0019/kwh. Materials are PVC, HDPE, PET, Buna, and SS316, so >>> corrosion should be a minor problem. >>> >>> As long the material holds up, maintenance should be minimal. >>> >>> I will need to equip a bunch of divers with scuba gear but that is a one >>> time expense. The pumps are deployed in shallow waters <35', so >>> maintenance is simple. >>> >>> Operating cost: maybe a dozen engineers and workers per power plant >>> location. Seems small to me. >>> >>> >>> Jojo >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> *From:* Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Sent:* Monday, August 11, 2014 7:51 AM >>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Rossi reveals EMF activity in the Hot Cat >>> >>> Jojo, I think you are too fast in some of the conclusions. >>> 1. I think you can take heat from the sun, directly. >>> 2. I am sure thaot if you have free energy desalination is an easily >>> implemented technology that is econojical. >>> 3. In ao way I agree with you. However, once you are in the middle of >>> something all the small details willdisturb ones which for ao quick >>> solution. >>> 4. Same as 3 above. >>> yes, I understand that if one can take energy out of the sea that is >>> equivalent to LENR in some regards as a cheap energy resourse. However, >>> being a sailor I know that whatever you put in the sea becomes al big hole >>> which you have to fill with money all the time. Is that not the probloem >>> with your walve project. BTW I have a pressure system for the sea. I do not >>> even want to think about putting it in the sea as my experience is a big >>> hole.:) >>> On Aug 10, 2014 4:35 PM, "Jojo Iznart" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> You're funny my friend. >>>> >>>> I actually still have a little confidence in the hotcat, but not with >>>> the mythical hyperion though. >>>> >>>> Here are some developments and pronouncements of Rossi that really do >>>> not make sense. >>>> >>>> 1. Solar-powered hotcat. Supposedly they are researching a way to use >>>> solar power to drive the hotcat. This is so stupid. Why would you deploy >>>> expensive solar panels to generate high value electicity and convert it to >>>> heat so that you can convert it back to electricity. >>>> >>>> 2. Sea water desalination is not economical. The hotcat is >>>> essentially a free heat source. How can it not be economical to distill >>>> sea water? >>>> >>>> 3. The continuing delay is a dead giveaway. If he has something as >>>> revolutionary as the hotcat, he should be rushing this to market. >>>> >>>> 4. The 1MW plant visits. Rossi has been promising this for over a >>>> year now. Where is the plant? At least we should know where it is even if >>>> we can't visit it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have been supportive of Rossi and the TIP1 report was convincing to >>>> me. But the coninuing red flags popping up is disconcerting. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Well, like the suncell, I want the hotcat to fail also to give me a >>>> chance to make billions with my wave-powered design. >>>> >>>> >>>> Jojo >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> >>>> *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> >>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 11, 2014 7:07 AM >>>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Rossi reveals EMF activity in the Hot Cat >>>> >>>> Are you sure your not the legendary Rossi haters MaryHugo or Joshua >>>> Cude masquerading as that wonderful fellow JoJo. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Or a simpler explanation is he picks up some speculations here and >>>>> applies it to his reactors to give it some credibility. >>>>> >>>>> The TIP1 report gave the hotcat some credibility. The continuing >>>>> delay of the TIP2 report, the continuing delay of the 1MW plant visits, >>>>> plus the hydrofusion fire sale tells me something is going on, and it is >>>>> not good. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jojo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> >>>>> *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> >>>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 11, 2014 6:50 AM >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Rossi reveals EMF activity in the Hot Cat >>>>> >>>>> I am just ahead of Rossi in the understanding of his reactor. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Why do I get the feeling that Rossi reads Axil's posts here in >>>>>> Vortex. It seems to me that many of the speculations of Axil >>>>>> serendipitously appear in the Hotcat. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Jojo >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> >>>>>> *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> >>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 11, 2014 2:41 AM >>>>>> *Subject:* [Vo]:Rossi reveals EMF activity in the Hot Cat >>>>>> >>>>>> Dave Lafleur >>>>>> >>>>>> August 3rd, 2014 at 4:06 PM >>>>>> If you are finding a magnetic byproduct as well that is certainly >>>>>> interesting. You had no mention of magnetic materials. Care to comment? >>>>>> Should I be surprised if you find a monopole mechanism? I apologize for >>>>>> my >>>>>> questions with no (known?) answers but you sir are a mad scientist and >>>>>> enjoy your blog. I believe that skepticism is healthy but positive or >>>>>> negative this would be a better world if more scientists were asking your >>>>>> questions. >>>>>> >>>>>> Andrea Rossi >>>>>> August 3rd, 2014 at 4:29 PM >>>>>> Dave Lafleur: >>>>>> It is not exactly as you wrote. We have found as an unexpected >>>>>> phenomenon the direct production of electromagnetic energy. This is an >>>>>> issue we are making R&D upon, but, sincerely, in this period my focus is >>>>>> on >>>>>> the 1 MW plant of the new US Customer. I agree about what you say in >>>>>> regard >>>>>> of scepticism. >>>>>> Warm Regards, >>>>>> A.R. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>
