Sounds like you have a vehicle, Jojo. I think you will be years ahead of BLP..Maybe I should license one here in Icalifornia? Sounds very good and much closer to reality than any LENR device so far. Yes , in 2025 you might be obsolete but that matters very little if you earned 5 cents per kWh out of 100,000MWh. (an even billion? Correct?). On Aug 11, 2014 3:04 PM, "Jojo Iznart" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, the pumps does indeed only have a design lifetime of 10 years. If > my materials last 10 year under seawater, they would have generated > electricity at $0.0019/kwh. > > Regarding growth on the pumps....it's inconsequencial. It will not affect > the functioning of the pumps. In fact, I am looking for ways to encourage > growth on it to protect it from further damag and corrosion. > > > > Jojo > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:12 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Wave-powered design > > Hello Jojo, > My only experience comes from sailing and sale boats (aka a hole in the > water a little joke among sailors). > Having said that I am sure your calculations have merit from an > engineer7ng point of view but I suspect your maintenance estimates are low. > Things grow on your equipment. Material detoriates froom exposure > saltwater. Currents move the equipment. Storms destroys pieces. > I could continue but I mightbe to pessimistic. A gould idea should be to > invole a warf, which builds commersial small vessels and get them to make > sure they take precaution for the majority of the known problems to operate > in seawater. My guess is that you need to replace your investment within 10 > to 15 years. However, I am just an amateur. Good luck and check all the > details. > On Aug 10, 2014 5:24 PM, "Jojo Iznart" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Lennart, thanks for your comments. >> >> Can you please elaborate on what you mean by a "big hole". Do you mean >> the maintenance expenditure would be expensive? If so, why do you think >> that would be? Is it the corrosion of the materials? The labor cost in >> maintaining it? The infrastrucuture cost? The deployment cost? In your >> experience, where is the money pit? >> >> My system can be built for <$200-$230/kw, producing electricity at around >> $0.0019/kwh. Materials are PVC, HDPE, PET, Buna, and SS316, so corrosion >> should be a minor problem. >> >> As long the material holds up, maintenance should be minimal. >> >> I will need to equip a bunch of divers with scuba gear but that is a one >> time expense. The pumps are deployed in shallow waters <35', so >> maintenance is simple. >> >> Operating cost: maybe a dozen engineers and workers per power plant >> location. Seems small to me. >> >> >> Jojo >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Sent:* Monday, August 11, 2014 7:51 AM >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Rossi reveals EMF activity in the Hot Cat >> >> Jojo, I think you are too fast in some of the conclusions. >> 1. I think you can take heat from the sun, directly. >> 2. I am sure thaot if you have free energy desalination is an easily >> implemented technology that is econojical. >> 3. In ao way I agree with you. However, once you are in the middle of >> something all the small details willdisturb ones which for ao quick >> solution. >> 4. Same as 3 above. >> yes, I understand that if one can take energy out of the sea that is >> equivalent to LENR in some regards as a cheap energy resourse. However, >> being a sailor I know that whatever you put in the sea becomes al big hole >> which you have to fill with money all the time. Is that not the probloem >> with your walve project. BTW I have a pressure system for the sea. I do not >> even want to think about putting it in the sea as my experience is a big >> hole.:) >> On Aug 10, 2014 4:35 PM, "Jojo Iznart" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> You're funny my friend. >>> >>> I actually still have a little confidence in the hotcat, but not with >>> the mythical hyperion though. >>> >>> Here are some developments and pronouncements of Rossi that really do >>> not make sense. >>> >>> 1. Solar-powered hotcat. Supposedly they are researching a way to use >>> solar power to drive the hotcat. This is so stupid. Why would you deploy >>> expensive solar panels to generate high value electicity and convert it to >>> heat so that you can convert it back to electricity. >>> >>> 2. Sea water desalination is not economical. The hotcat is essentially >>> a free heat source. How can it not be economical to distill sea water? >>> >>> 3. The continuing delay is a dead giveaway. If he has something as >>> revolutionary as the hotcat, he should be rushing this to market. >>> >>> 4. The 1MW plant visits. Rossi has been promising this for over a year >>> now. Where is the plant? At least we should know where it is even if we >>> can't visit it. >>> >>> >>> >>> I have been supportive of Rossi and the TIP1 report was convincing to >>> me. But the coninuing red flags popping up is disconcerting. >>> >>> >>> >>> Well, like the suncell, I want the hotcat to fail also to give me a >>> chance to make billions with my wave-powered design. >>> >>> >>> Jojo >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> >>> *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Monday, August 11, 2014 7:07 AM >>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Rossi reveals EMF activity in the Hot Cat >>> >>> Are you sure your not the legendary Rossi haters MaryHugo or Joshua >>> Cude masquerading as that wonderful fellow JoJo. >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Or a simpler explanation is he picks up some speculations here and >>>> applies it to his reactors to give it some credibility. >>>> >>>> The TIP1 report gave the hotcat some credibility. The continuing delay >>>> of the TIP2 report, the continuing delay of the 1MW plant visits, plus the >>>> hydrofusion fire sale tells me something is going on, and it is not good. >>>> >>>> >>>> Jojo >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> >>>> *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> >>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 11, 2014 6:50 AM >>>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Rossi reveals EMF activity in the Hot Cat >>>> >>>> I am just ahead of Rossi in the understanding of his reactor. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Why do I get the feeling that Rossi reads Axil's posts here in >>>>> Vortex. It seems to me that many of the speculations of Axil >>>>> serendipitously appear in the Hotcat. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jojo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> >>>>> *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> >>>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 11, 2014 2:41 AM >>>>> *Subject:* [Vo]:Rossi reveals EMF activity in the Hot Cat >>>>> >>>>> Dave Lafleur >>>>> >>>>> August 3rd, 2014 at 4:06 PM >>>>> If you are finding a magnetic byproduct as well that is certainly >>>>> interesting. You had no mention of magnetic materials. Care to comment? >>>>> Should I be surprised if you find a monopole mechanism? I apologize for my >>>>> questions with no (known?) answers but you sir are a mad scientist and >>>>> enjoy your blog. I believe that skepticism is healthy but positive or >>>>> negative this would be a better world if more scientists were asking your >>>>> questions. >>>>> >>>>> Andrea Rossi >>>>> August 3rd, 2014 at 4:29 PM >>>>> Dave Lafleur: >>>>> It is not exactly as you wrote. We have found as an unexpected >>>>> phenomenon the direct production of electromagnetic energy. This is an >>>>> issue we are making R&D upon, but, sincerely, in this period my focus is >>>>> on >>>>> the 1 MW plant of the new US Customer. I agree about what you say in >>>>> regard >>>>> of scepticism. >>>>> Warm Regards, >>>>> A.R. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>
