http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_electromagnetism_and_special_relativity
Magnetism is an emergent property of charge. Magnetism is a mechanism that projects charge from one relativistic reference frame to another to equalize causality between frames. Magnetism is a method to focus and concentrate charge directionally. Among others, a Nano cavity is a mechanism that forms the relativistic reference frame of the moving charge. I don't know yet what mechanism produces spin in the electron, photon and proton. If anyone knows, please share your understanding; this origin of spin is something I would like to understand. Maybe someone in the Mills camp might know a reference to this in his big book. On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Roarty, Francis X < [email protected]> wrote: > Axil, I agree with your statement [snip] Variability of nuclear decay > rates is caused my magnetism. This ability for magnetism to affect nuclear > processes is the driving force behind LENR.” [/snip]. I like that you said > “variability” which encompasses both extended and shortened half lives of > radioactive material. I suspect that all nuclear material [not just > radioactive] is “aging” at an anomalous rate when exposed to confinement of > virtual particles and therefore nanomagnetism. Although I believe that > nano geometry creates nano magnetism when it impedes larger virtual > particles from forming by virtue of being smaller than the vacuum > wavelengths trying to fit between the geometrical boundaries [mirrors], I > also wonder about magnetisms effect on these nano sources when a large > magnetic field is further directed thru their environment from the macro > scale which Jones has often suggested. IMHO variation in > geometries[cavities] may allow some of the extreme variations from the > chaotic foam level to seep into these segregated regions instead of totally > cancelling out as they are supposed to do at the physical scale .. a > quantum gift basket allowing for a type of Maxwellian demon.. or at least > setting the stage for a Maxwllian demon by doing the segregation portion > for free as a consequence of geometry.. not the classical reservoirs of hot > and cold atoms but the opportunity to exploit the segregation of vacuum > pressures into regions via hydrogen loading by whatever pet theory you > happen to endorse. > > Fran > > > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 13, 2014 11:18 AM > *To:* vortex-l > > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:magnetism, does it effect space and time? > > > > > http://www.projectworldawareness.com/2010/10/terrifying-scientific-discovery-strange-emissions-by-sun-are-suddenly-mutating-matter/ > > I believe that the variability of nuclear decay rates is the driving > principle behind LENR. This decay rate variability is showing up through a > strange correlation between solar activity and the rate of radioactive > decay. > > One aspect of the correlation is centered on the sun’s core and its > rotational rate. Another solar correlation is centered on the occurrence of > solar flares. And yet another correlation is centered of seasonal > variations in the radioactive decay rates. > > > > > http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/08/24/0155229/the-strange-case-of-solar-flares-and-radioactive-decay-rates?sdsrc=rel > > *Current models for radioactive decay have been challenged by, of all > sources, the sun. According to the article, 'On Dec 13, 2006, the sun > itself provided a crucial clue, when a solar flare sent a stream of > particles and radiation toward Earth. Purdue nuclear engineer Jere Jenkins, > while measuring the decay rate of manganese-54, a short-lived isotope used > in medical diagnostics, noticed that the rate dropped slightly during the > flare, a decrease that started about a day and a half before the flare.' > This is important because the rate of decay is very important not just for > antique dating, but also for cancer treatment, time keeping, and the > generation of random numbers. This isn't a onetime measurement, either. > 'Checking data collected at Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island > and the Federal Physical and Technical Institute in Germany, they came > across something even more surprising: long-term observation of the decay > rate of silicon-32 and radium-226 seemed to show a small seasonal > variation. The decay rate was ever so slightly faster in winter than in > summer.'"* > > > > Since the sun’s core is known to blast out continuous streams of particles > called neutrinos, some scientists are attempting to find evidence that > neutrinos are the culprits behind the mutation of matter. > > There’s a problem with that hypothesis, however, as neutrinos are like > ghost particles. They’re extremely difficult to detect. Normally, neutrinos > pass through the Earth without any interaction at all. To a neutrino, it’s > as if the Earth doesn’t exist. > > But a recent experiment discounts neutrinos as the source of the > correlation. > > > http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/09/25/0254219/Scientists-Confirm-Nuclear-Decay-Rate-Constancy > > "Scientists at the US National Institute of Standards and Technology and > Purdue University have ruled out neutrino flux as a cause of previously > observed fluctuations in nuclear decay rates. From the article: > 'Researchers ... tested this by comparing radioactive gold-198 in two > shapes, spheres and thin foils, with the same mass and activity. Gold-198 > releases neutrinos as it decays. The team reasoned that if neutrinos are > affecting the decay rate, the atoms in the spheres should decay more slowly > than the atoms in the foil because the neutrinos emitted by the atoms in > the spheres would have a greater chance of interacting with their > neighboring atoms. The maximum neutrino flux in the sample in their > experiments was several times greater than the flux of neutrinos from the > sun. The researchers followed the gamma-ray emission rate of each source > for several weeks and found no difference between the decay rate of the > spheres and the corresponding foils.' The paper can be found here on arXiv. > Slashdot has previously covered the original announcement and followed up > with the skepticism of other scientists." > > > > Here is a collection of papers collected by mit on this subject > > http://web.mit.edu/redingtn/www/netadv/XperDecRat.html > > > > IMHO, Variability of nuclear decay rates is caused my magnetism. This > ability for magnetism to affect nuclear processes is the driving force > behind LENR. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:18 AM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I can see where you are coming from, which implies nature operates off > a vacuum at her most basic level, which I agree with. > > For me the question is how much energy is pumped into that vacuum and > is it isotropic and smooth or actually forming strings and > multidimensional branes depending upon how much vacuum energy that is > pumped into it in the local space. > > I see what I think is a tremendous amount of lensing and bending of > electromagnetic radiation (light and Doppler) during storms on Earth, > which I think is high energy vacuum inflation and decay. > > In a typical gas, when you pump energy into it it expands and/or gets > hot. In our atmosphere, the highest energy storms have severe cold > fronts associated with them and the lowest pressures along a very thin > line of condensing, completely opposite what one would expect. It > think along this line you will find strings of vacuum, probably with a > BEC surrounding them and ionized plasma. > > Like I have said before, IMHO our weather is really our decaying > quantum gravity field inflating above us and condensing everything > around it. > > I think inflating vacuum sucks you in and then spits you out releasing > entropy, like a tornado. > > Stewart > > > > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Roarty, Francis X > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Stewart, > > > > I think part of the confusion is the way we consider time and gravity at > a > > macro scale with an isotropy where time is constant in an inertial frame > and > > gravity only changes at the square of distance, gravity has a constant / > > slow to change spatial vector at macro scale while at a nano scale it is > > more like the winds of Chicago with changes in direction and pressure > > occurring based on proximity and size of buildings that obstruct the > flow. > > The slow to change temporal dilation via near C velocities imposes a > false > > impression upon us about how difficult it is to change this vacuum > pressure > > because we are in competition with C – trying to make a difference in a > > Pythagorean relationship on that scale is necessary in normal > space..BUT.. > > in a lattice or other conductive geometries you can modify vacuum > pressure > > in the opposite direction without use of energy or velocity because we > are > > instead using geometry to “impede” the native flow.. meaning that you can > > actually go slower than “stop” from a 4D perspective –and it is we that > > appear to “SLOW” [in a Paradox twin sense] from the perspective of these > > hydrogen atoms sheltered from the pressure in these umbrella like Casimir > > cavities/nano geometries.. IMHO the Paradox Twin phenomena can be > achieved > > very easily by impeding virtual particle flow with nano geometry as > > compared to trying to accelerate it with near C motion. I posit that, > which > > we consider catalytic action, is actually based on a combination of this > > same relativistic dilation and sudden changes in the rate of this > dilation > > brought on by the changes in chemical geometry of catalysts in a > reaction > > relative to moving reactants – even just adding liquids together in water > > and observing sudden color changes could be explained by chemical > geometries > > of the catalysts WRT the reactants AND would go far in my mind to > explain > > why catalysts are said to not participate or get used up in a > > reaction..they are too busy forming the nano umbrellas which vary the > vacuum > > pressure and give the non catalysts in the reaction a free white water > ride > > thru these CHANGES in VP pressure which I believe discount energy > > threshold requirements for reactions allowing them to occur much more > > rapidly – I am not saying the dilation is so acute that the reactions are > > happening at their normal rate from their own local perspective [although > > there has to be some level of dilation present] but rather it is the > rapid > > tearing at an inverse cube rate in opposition to the normal inverse > square > > law of the macro isotropy that accelerates the reaction time by > discounting > > the energy needed. I posit that catalytic action is already a form of ZPE > > that has been rolled into the COE but which fails to take into account > the > > possibility of larger dilation factors of the nano powders and skeletal > cats > > cited in most of these anomalous heat claims. > > > > Fran > > > > > > > > From: ChemE Stewart [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 9:59 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:magnetism, does it effect space and time? > > > > > > > > Yes, more magnetic flux more decay. Oscillating magnetic fields induce > > electrical currents which can cause decay. > > > > > > > > I think gravity(quantum vacuum) and magnetic fields are related. I've > tried > > to fit it to M Theory and relate it to what you and Jones and Ed and Fran > > are all sharing. > > > > > > > > I think our gravitational fields are made up of closed strings of quantum > > vacuum (extra dimension curled up, i.e plasmoids) streaming between our > > solar brane and earth brane in the solar wind, which warp space slightly > > around them. > > > > > > > > The strings inflate and decay in our atmosphere and power our jet streams > > and weather(through condensing of the atmosphere) and cause geomagnetic > and > > electromagnetic upsets, which are worse after CME's which can also > trigger > > accelerated decay and Earthquakes, etc. > > > > > > > > I think the Earth's magnetic fields are triggering inflation of quantum > > vacuum from the solar wind in a similar way that magnetic fields are > > interacting with the vacuum in LENR and that microwave drive NASA is > > testing. > > > > > > > > I think we are living in the inflation phase of our "local" universe. We > > live in slight vacuum all of the time and this vacuum energy is > > variable(weather disturbances) and therefore so is "Time". That is why > > background radiation goes up many times during storms. > > > > > > > > Once we learn to control this vacuum "inflation" (which I think is Dark > > Energy) we will be on our way. > > > > > > > > Stewart > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, August 12, 2014, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > More gravitational flux, more decay. > > > > > > > > Don't you mean more magnetic flux, more decay? > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:16 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Everything is decaying faster around pulsed microwave radar towers, I am > > convinced of that. As I mentioned before, I think "time" is really a > rate > > of decay. More gravitational flux, more decay. "Time is really the > decay > > it takes to go from one place to the other", which varies. > > > > > > > > Just my take on it. > > > > > > > > Stewart > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, August 12, 2014, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It looks to me like magnetism speeds up the march of time by straitening > > out the curved space imposed by matter on space/time. The larger that the > > density of matter is, the greater is the effects of magnetism to > accelerate > > time. > > > > > > > > Does anybody has an opinion one way or the other? > > > > > > >
