https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_electromagnetism
"Though Coulomb's law expresses action at a distance <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_at_a_distance_(physics)>, it is an easily understood *electric force* principle." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TKSfAkWWN0 On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_electromagnetism_and_special_relativity > > Magnetism is an emergent property of charge. Magnetism is a mechanism that > projects charge from one relativistic reference frame to another to > equalize causality between frames. Magnetism is a method to focus and > concentrate charge directionally. Among others, a Nano cavity is a > mechanism that forms the relativistic reference frame of the moving charge. > > I don't know yet what mechanism produces spin in the electron, photon and > proton. If anyone knows, please share your understanding; this origin of > spin is something I would like to understand. Maybe someone in the Mills > camp might know a reference to this in his big book. > > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Roarty, Francis X < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Axil, I agree with your statement [snip] Variability of nuclear >> decay rates is caused my magnetism. This ability for magnetism to affect >> nuclear processes is the driving force behind LENR.” [/snip]. I like that >> you said “variability” which encompasses both extended and shortened half >> lives of radioactive material. I suspect that all nuclear material [not >> just radioactive] is “aging” at an anomalous rate when exposed to >> confinement of virtual particles and therefore nanomagnetism. Although I >> believe that nano geometry creates nano magnetism when it impedes larger >> virtual particles from forming by virtue of being smaller than the vacuum >> wavelengths trying to fit between the geometrical boundaries [mirrors], I >> also wonder about magnetisms effect on these nano sources when a large >> magnetic field is further directed thru their environment from the macro >> scale which Jones has often suggested. IMHO variation in >> geometries[cavities] may allow some of the extreme variations from the >> chaotic foam level to seep into these segregated regions instead of totally >> cancelling out as they are supposed to do at the physical scale .. a >> quantum gift basket allowing for a type of Maxwellian demon.. or at least >> setting the stage for a Maxwllian demon by doing the segregation portion >> for free as a consequence of geometry.. not the classical reservoirs of hot >> and cold atoms but the opportunity to exploit the segregation of vacuum >> pressures into regions via hydrogen loading by whatever pet theory you >> happen to endorse. >> >> Fran >> >> >> >> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 13, 2014 11:18 AM >> *To:* vortex-l >> >> *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:magnetism, does it effect space and time? >> >> >> >> >> http://www.projectworldawareness.com/2010/10/terrifying-scientific-discovery-strange-emissions-by-sun-are-suddenly-mutating-matter/ >> >> I believe that the variability of nuclear decay rates is the driving >> principle behind LENR. This decay rate variability is showing up through a >> strange correlation between solar activity and the rate of radioactive >> decay. >> >> One aspect of the correlation is centered on the sun’s core and its >> rotational rate. Another solar correlation is centered on the occurrence of >> solar flares. And yet another correlation is centered of seasonal >> variations in the radioactive decay rates. >> >> >> >> >> http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/08/24/0155229/the-strange-case-of-solar-flares-and-radioactive-decay-rates?sdsrc=rel >> >> *Current models for radioactive decay have been challenged by, of all >> sources, the sun. According to the article, 'On Dec 13, 2006, the sun >> itself provided a crucial clue, when a solar flare sent a stream of >> particles and radiation toward Earth. Purdue nuclear engineer Jere Jenkins, >> while measuring the decay rate of manganese-54, a short-lived isotope used >> in medical diagnostics, noticed that the rate dropped slightly during the >> flare, a decrease that started about a day and a half before the flare.' >> This is important because the rate of decay is very important not just for >> antique dating, but also for cancer treatment, time keeping, and the >> generation of random numbers. This isn't a onetime measurement, either. >> 'Checking data collected at Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island >> and the Federal Physical and Technical Institute in Germany, they came >> across something even more surprising: long-term observation of the decay >> rate of silicon-32 and radium-226 seemed to show a small seasonal >> variation. The decay rate was ever so slightly faster in winter than in >> summer.'"* >> >> >> >> Since the sun’s core is known to blast out continuous streams of >> particles called neutrinos, some scientists are attempting to find evidence >> that neutrinos are the culprits behind the mutation of matter. >> >> There’s a problem with that hypothesis, however, as neutrinos are like >> ghost particles. They’re extremely difficult to detect. Normally, neutrinos >> pass through the Earth without any interaction at all. To a neutrino, it’s >> as if the Earth doesn’t exist. >> >> But a recent experiment discounts neutrinos as the source of the >> correlation. >> >> >> http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/09/25/0254219/Scientists-Confirm-Nuclear-Decay-Rate-Constancy >> >> "Scientists at the US National Institute of Standards and Technology and >> Purdue University have ruled out neutrino flux as a cause of previously >> observed fluctuations in nuclear decay rates. From the article: >> 'Researchers ... tested this by comparing radioactive gold-198 in two >> shapes, spheres and thin foils, with the same mass and activity. Gold-198 >> releases neutrinos as it decays. The team reasoned that if neutrinos are >> affecting the decay rate, the atoms in the spheres should decay more slowly >> than the atoms in the foil because the neutrinos emitted by the atoms in >> the spheres would have a greater chance of interacting with their >> neighboring atoms. The maximum neutrino flux in the sample in their >> experiments was several times greater than the flux of neutrinos from the >> sun. The researchers followed the gamma-ray emission rate of each source >> for several weeks and found no difference between the decay rate of the >> spheres and the corresponding foils.' The paper can be found here on arXiv. >> Slashdot has previously covered the original announcement and followed up >> with the skepticism of other scientists." >> >> >> >> Here is a collection of papers collected by mit on this subject >> >> http://web.mit.edu/redingtn/www/netadv/XperDecRat.html >> >> >> >> IMHO, Variability of nuclear decay rates is caused my magnetism. This >> ability for magnetism to affect nuclear processes is the driving force >> behind LENR. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:18 AM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I can see where you are coming from, which implies nature operates off >> a vacuum at her most basic level, which I agree with. >> >> For me the question is how much energy is pumped into that vacuum and >> is it isotropic and smooth or actually forming strings and >> multidimensional branes depending upon how much vacuum energy that is >> pumped into it in the local space. >> >> I see what I think is a tremendous amount of lensing and bending of >> electromagnetic radiation (light and Doppler) during storms on Earth, >> which I think is high energy vacuum inflation and decay. >> >> In a typical gas, when you pump energy into it it expands and/or gets >> hot. In our atmosphere, the highest energy storms have severe cold >> fronts associated with them and the lowest pressures along a very thin >> line of condensing, completely opposite what one would expect. It >> think along this line you will find strings of vacuum, probably with a >> BEC surrounding them and ionized plasma. >> >> Like I have said before, IMHO our weather is really our decaying >> quantum gravity field inflating above us and condensing everything >> around it. >> >> I think inflating vacuum sucks you in and then spits you out releasing >> entropy, like a tornado. >> >> Stewart >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Roarty, Francis X >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Stewart, >> > >> > I think part of the confusion is the way we consider time and gravity >> at a >> > macro scale with an isotropy where time is constant in an inertial >> frame and >> > gravity only changes at the square of distance, gravity has a constant / >> > slow to change spatial vector at macro scale while at a nano scale it >> is >> > more like the winds of Chicago with changes in direction and pressure >> > occurring based on proximity and size of buildings that obstruct the >> flow. >> > The slow to change temporal dilation via near C velocities imposes a >> false >> > impression upon us about how difficult it is to change this vacuum >> pressure >> > because we are in competition with C – trying to make a difference in a >> > Pythagorean relationship on that scale is necessary in normal >> space..BUT.. >> > in a lattice or other conductive geometries you can modify vacuum >> pressure >> > in the opposite direction without use of energy or velocity because we >> are >> > instead using geometry to “impede” the native flow.. meaning that you >> can >> > actually go slower than “stop” from a 4D perspective –and it is we that >> > appear to “SLOW” [in a Paradox twin sense] from the perspective of these >> > hydrogen atoms sheltered from the pressure in these umbrella like >> Casimir >> > cavities/nano geometries.. IMHO the Paradox Twin phenomena can be >> achieved >> > very easily by impeding virtual particle flow with nano geometry as >> > compared to trying to accelerate it with near C motion. I posit that, >> which >> > we consider catalytic action, is actually based on a combination of this >> > same relativistic dilation and sudden changes in the rate of this >> dilation >> > brought on by the changes in chemical geometry of catalysts in a >> reaction >> > relative to moving reactants – even just adding liquids together in >> water >> > and observing sudden color changes could be explained by chemical >> geometries >> > of the catalysts WRT the reactants AND would go far in my mind to >> explain >> > why catalysts are said to not participate or get used up in a >> > reaction..they are too busy forming the nano umbrellas which vary the >> vacuum >> > pressure and give the non catalysts in the reaction a free white water >> ride >> > thru these CHANGES in VP pressure which I believe discount energy >> > threshold requirements for reactions allowing them to occur much more >> > rapidly – I am not saying the dilation is so acute that the reactions >> are >> > happening at their normal rate from their own local perspective >> [although >> > there has to be some level of dilation present] but rather it is the >> rapid >> > tearing at an inverse cube rate in opposition to the normal inverse >> square >> > law of the macro isotropy that accelerates the reaction time by >> discounting >> > the energy needed. I posit that catalytic action is already a form of >> ZPE >> > that has been rolled into the COE but which fails to take into account >> the >> > possibility of larger dilation factors of the nano powders and skeletal >> cats >> > cited in most of these anomalous heat claims. >> > >> > Fran >> > >> > >> > >> > From: ChemE Stewart [mailto:[email protected]] >> > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 9:59 PM >> > To: [email protected] >> > Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:magnetism, does it effect space and time? >> > >> > >> > >> > Yes, more magnetic flux more decay. Oscillating magnetic fields induce >> > electrical currents which can cause decay. >> > >> > >> > >> > I think gravity(quantum vacuum) and magnetic fields are related. I've >> tried >> > to fit it to M Theory and relate it to what you and Jones and Ed and >> Fran >> > are all sharing. >> > >> > >> > >> > I think our gravitational fields are made up of closed strings of >> quantum >> > vacuum (extra dimension curled up, i.e plasmoids) streaming between our >> > solar brane and earth brane in the solar wind, which warp space slightly >> > around them. >> > >> > >> > >> > The strings inflate and decay in our atmosphere and power our jet >> streams >> > and weather(through condensing of the atmosphere) and cause geomagnetic >> and >> > electromagnetic upsets, which are worse after CME's which can also >> trigger >> > accelerated decay and Earthquakes, etc. >> > >> > >> > >> > I think the Earth's magnetic fields are triggering inflation of quantum >> > vacuum from the solar wind in a similar way that magnetic fields are >> > interacting with the vacuum in LENR and that microwave drive NASA is >> > testing. >> > >> > >> > >> > I think we are living in the inflation phase of our "local" universe. >> We >> > live in slight vacuum all of the time and this vacuum energy is >> > variable(weather disturbances) and therefore so is "Time". That is why >> > background radiation goes up many times during storms. >> > >> > >> > >> > Once we learn to control this vacuum "inflation" (which I think is Dark >> > Energy) we will be on our way. >> > >> > >> > >> > Stewart >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tuesday, August 12, 2014, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > More gravitational flux, more decay. >> > >> > >> > >> > Don't you mean more magnetic flux, more decay? >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:16 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > Everything is decaying faster around pulsed microwave radar towers, I am >> > convinced of that. As I mentioned before, I think "time" is really a >> rate >> > of decay. More gravitational flux, more decay. "Time is really the >> decay >> > it takes to go from one place to the other", which varies. >> > >> > >> > >> > Just my take on it. >> > >> > >> > >> > Stewart >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tuesday, August 12, 2014, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > It looks to me like magnetism speeds up the march of time by >> straitening >> > out the curved space imposed by matter on space/time. The larger that >> the >> > density of matter is, the greater is the effects of magnetism to >> accelerate >> > time. >> > >> > >> > >> > Does anybody has an opinion one way or the other? >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >
